Mega essays group work

SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips. There are a lot of “Best SAT Books” lists out there. We think most of them aren’t very good or thorough, and I’ve tried to write a much better guide here. You’ll learn which books are absolutely critical for your prep, which books you should use to improve individual sections, and which books you need if you’re aiming for a top score. Importantly, you’ll also learn HOW to use these books to study effectively. Keep reading to learn more. This guide is detailed, so here are quick reference links. I recommend you read the whole thing if you can. What’s Better About This Guide to the Best SAT Books?

Because your SAT score is mega essays work, important, and you’ll probably spend a good amount of time studying, it’s important that you get the business plan, right advice. Follow the wrong advice, and mega group work, it might be too late to improve your score. Therefore, it’s important to vet the forced drug testing essay, advice you get (including ours) before deciding on work your SAT Prep plan. Before you read each article in subject your research, you should think – why should I trust this person online giving me advice? To be transparent, here’s why this guide is better than others online, so you can decide for yourself: I explain in mega work detail why good books are good, and what each book's flaws are. You probably haven’t heard of some of these books, because they're either newer or are hidden gems, and they're not featured as widely as the books from large companies that have large marketing budgets. Most other guides just list a few books without context. Rhetorical Essay On The Gettysburg! One important disclaimer: I’m co-founder of PrepScholar, an online SAT/ACT prep program. I believe we’ve built the essays group, best prep program available right now. It diagnoses your strengths and weaknesses and gives you a structured all-in-one program, combining the best aspects of the forced drug, books below, so you know exactly what you need to study at every point.

But I want to stress that you don’t need a program to essays group, excel at the SAT. In fact, writing this guide may lose us some customers, since you might decide that you don’t need a program at all. But if you decide that you don’t want to manage 10 books and want an integrated complete program that customizes to your learning, check PrepScholar SAT out. If you’re serious about SAT prep, keep reading. Want to essay, improve your SAT score by 160 points? Tired of wasting time prepping in ways that don't work? We have the industry's leading SAT prep program.

Built by Harvard grads and SAT full scorers, the program learns your strengths and work, weaknesses through advanced statistics, then customizes your prep program to you so you get the most effective prep possible. Winning Essay! It's the best prep program available right now. Best of all, we guarantee your money back if you don't improve your score by mega group work 160 points or more. Check out our 5-day free trial today: First, this guide is for students who are serious about their prep . You need to be motivated to get a high score, and you need to forced drug testing essay, be willing to put in hard work. Essays! Getting through these books will take dozens of forced drug hours, simply because the SAT covers so much material. If you just plan to study 5 hours, your choice of book doesn’t make any difference . You should focus your time just on taking a sample practice test and reviewing your answers. Essays Group Work! Your score won’t go up much, and about importance of moral, you shouldn’t expect miracles. Buying the books is the first and easiest step of SAT prep. You'll need to put in serious work to actually get the essays group work, score improvements. We’ll explain below the electrical, best way to get the most out of these books. Secondly, this guide is for students who want to improve their score by mega essays over 100 points.

To make consistent improvements of this level, you need more than just tricks. You need to understand the content of what’s being tested – the underlying math concepts and grammar rules – rather than just tricks that make you feel like you learned something but are actually not effective. Again, if you’re just looking to improve by 50 points, it’s possible for you to do that just by retaking the test, especially if you’ve taken the test only essay about importance education once. Finally, to improve by studying books, you need to have a great study strategy . It is mega group, NOT enough to just read a book cover by drug essay cover. So many students spend dozens of hours cracking through book after book without improving their score.

Why? Because they're not understanding what their weaknesses are and focusing their time on their weaknesses. If you don't focus your time on your weaknesses, you won't improve! It sounds obvious, but it's pretty hard for many students to actually do this well. I write a lot more about this in my Perfect SAT Score guide, and mega essays, that's how I designed our PrepScholar SAT program to do all the hard structural work for you. If you’re serious about to thesis score improvement, and you want to work, study with only books, this is the guide for you. Engineering! We’re going to divide the best SAT books into a few categories: Critical Books : Must have books as part of your prep program, no matter your skill level or weaknesses.

Subject Training Books : The best books to use to train Reading, Math, and Writing. Books for Top Scorers : Books that will push you over work, the top. Books for Low Scorers and Low Motivation : If you only want to study for 5 hours and improve a little bit, this is OK. Otherwise avoid. The #1 Book to Avoid : New for this year - a book I always used to recommend is now squarely in on the gettysburg address the Do Not Buy list.

Find out which. Because the format of the test is changing so much, I do NOT recommend using Old SAT books to study for the New SAT. While the tests are more similar than not, you can waste a lot of time studying for the wrong thing, if you don't precisely know how the tests are different. Instead, use New SAT books, like the mega work, ones below, or use our PrepScholar SAT program. We rebuilt the program from the ground up and dissected the on the address, test to understand it fully. These are books that I believe everyone should have, regardless of work their current score, regardless of where they need to improve. This is engineering, extremely hard to qualify for, and in fact there are only two books out of dozens that I’ve tested: We’ve written at length about the importance of official SAT practice questions. The SAT test is weird and tests concepts in ways that you’ve never seen in school before. This means that you need to train with realistic questions so you learn the patterns of the SAT.

Official SAT tests released by the College Board are the gold standard for SAT practice questions. Each test released by the College Board contains real questions given to essays group, real students at previous administrations of the SAT. The quality of official questions is far better than questions written by drug essay unofficial sources like Kaplan and Barron's. Even better — all of the Official SAT Practice Tests for the New SAT are FREE ! You can download the PDFs, then print them out to mega group work, get the business, realistic on-paper testing experience. Visit our Complete Official SAT Practice Tests guide to download all the practice tests and answer keys for yourself. The best set of practice tests you can get anywhere, period - especially since the New SAT is so new. If you want to mega, take a practice test, these are the ones to use. Answer explanations are not helpful for self-learning for forced most students.

Most of the explanations read like this: “A is wrong because A is mega group work, wrong. Subject To Thesis! B is correct for essays group work these reasons” rather than showing you how to solve the question from importance of moral, step 1. If you don't know strategies for how to essays group, approach reading passages or alternative math strategies, you'll need more help. Now that the Black Book has finally been updated for the New SAT, it's only essay education other Critical book I'd recommend. It’s not sufficient by itself, and essays work, even with the practice tests above you’ll likely need more supplemental help, as I explain below. But what it does have is so good that I believe every student studying only with books should read it. What you’ll get from the Black Book is a way to think about the SAT. What does this even mean? Here are a few examples: You learn that the SAT is designed to be a predictable, standardized test . It needs to business expansion plan, test basic concepts so that it can be administered nationwide to all students, but it also needs to make it difficult, so it distorts the questions in a weird way. The concepts in this book were things I understood intuitively when I took the SAT and was studying for a perfect score. It’s influenced the mega, way that I think about teaching our students at PrepScholar.

Of all books on the market, this book aligns most closely with my personal philosophy on the SAT and how to succeed on it. Very lucid take on essay the SAT. The ideas within will change your view on the SAT and hopefully motivate you to mega group, work harder, knowing that any student can excel on the SAT. Requires a ton of self-discipline and insight to use effectively. Because you’re learning from your mistakes and no one is there to subject, guide you, you need to be self-driven to experiment with different strategies and find which one works best for you.

For some students, following a set of straight guidelines could be less confusing. Once again, I highly recommend these two resources for all students studying purely through books. We cover most of the important concepts in mega group work the Black Book in our SAT prep program and provide focused practice on individual skills. As I mentioned above, most likely you'll need specific training on each subject to essay, shore up your weaknesses. Mega Essays! Next, we'll provide specific resources for individual subjects. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points? We've written a guide about the top 5 strategies you must be using to business expansion plan, have a shot at improving your score. Mega Group! Download it for free now: Beyond the Critical books above, you’ll most likely need extra supplemental help on business plan specific sections.

The following section discusses the mega group work, best books for Reading, Math, and Writing. These books all follow my SAT prep philosophy: divide SAT content into skills, and get focused training on subject those skills use realistic, high-quality questions that prep you well for the real SAT cover only mega work what you need to know, not advanced material not on the SAT. On The Gettysburg! In my experience with thousands of students, SAT Reading is the most difficult section to mega, improve. It uses logical reasoning skills that aren’t as easily mastered as math concepts or grammar rules. It’s very important to drill down on what types of questions are asked, and how to approach these questions in a systematic way. Drug Essay! My recommendation for best SAT Reading book is The Critical Reader 2nd Edition, by mega essays work Erica Meltzer . This book dissects the business expansion plan, SAT Reading section by question type and group, skill. She does a great job of teaching the core of what the question is asking, and how to work with the passage to drug essay, arrive at the correct answer. Of all writers, Erica Meltzer aligns most closely with my personal philosophy of drilling questions skill-by-skill to recognize patterns to questions. Essays Work! Great breakdown of the Reading section on a skill-by-skill level.

Helpful strategies for to thesis every type of question. Exactly the same approach we use in our PrepScholar program. Pricey for a book that covers just one section ($26-$35) My philosophy on SAT math is that the best way to significantly improve your math score is to learn the underlying math content . Getting familiar with the questions and learning some simple strategies like ‘plug in the answer choices’ can get you a little progress, but you’ll quickly run into a ceiling if you have gaps in your underlying math skills. Your best bet is mega essays work, therefore to find a book that can both teach you math content in an organized way and give you practice problems to essay of moral, focus on individual skills. It should also tailor to your skill level , since math questions that are too hard or easy for you are a waste of mega essays time. For these reasons, I recommend Steve Warner’s series of business plan SAT Math books . He has multiple books out for mega essays work Beginner, Intermediate, and Advanced students, as well as a set of 240 SAT Math problems organized by topic and difficulty. Lessons teaching math concepts are clear and helpful. Essay Education! They suggest ways to speed up how you solve questions and identify what the question is really asking. The books split into the College Board's 4 major topics – Heart of Algebra, Geometry and Trig, Passport to Advanced Math, and Problem Solving and Data. This is essays group, too broad.

I prefer splitting these larger topics into subject to thesis even more specific subjects - for example, within Algebra, PrepScholar teaches linear functions, single variable equations, systems of group equations, and more. By focusing on each skill, you are able to more accurately pinpoint your weaknesses and drill them. If you’re really struggling with math at a basic level (say, scoring 500 and below), I’d recommend that you supplement your work with Khan Academy’s math modules. Rhetorical Essay On The Address! It’s a free program and essays, it provides an engaging way to train your most basic skills. I believe the core Khan Academy program has better instruction than their SAT prep program, even though it's not focused on the SAT. The best way to drug testing, excel at SAT Writing is to understand the grammar rules and how they appear on the SAT. Then, you need to essays, do a lot of focused practice questions to make sure you learn the patterns of the business expansion, SAT. Mega Group Work! That’s how we designed our PrepScholar online program to subject to thesis, teach you grammar. Group Work! Once again, I’m returning to expansion, Erica Meltzer for her SAT Grammar books . Essays! Erica’s fantastic at distilling all of grammar into what you need to know for the SAT.

You won’t learn arcane grammar concepts that aren’t tested. About Importance Of Moral! For the rules that are tested, she presents them clearly and covers the foundation if you’ve forgotten the grammar rule from school. Unlike her Reading book, for Writing she has two books . The Ultimate Guide to SAT Grammar covers all the grammar rules you need to know. The SAT Grammar Workbook gives hundreds of practice questions as training material. Mega Work! Neither book is sufficient on its own, which is a big drawback.

The first book doesn’t have enough questions to really drill the subject to thesis, grammar rules. The second book doesn’t teach the grammar rules, and the questions aren’t organized by group grammar rule. This really complicates the studying for the student, but I still believe this is the best Writing-focused book out there. Clear writing and address, articulation of mega work grammar rules. Winning! There's no guidance on study strategy. It's a nice breakdown of the SAT, but you don't get instruction on HOW to use the book to best maximize your score. Reading cover to cover isn't the most effective way. Learn more about focusing on your writing weaknesses in my Perfect SAT Writing Score guide. Once again, the price is high - $50 to $60 for both books . It’s good content, but I believe she could get a lot more customers by lowering her prices.

Bonus: Looking for the very best guides to every SAT section? Check out our top guides for every single section of the SAT. Choose the mega essays, score level you're aiming for: Choose these guides if you're scoring a 600 or above on a section, and you want to get the highest SAT score possible. Choose these guides if you're scoring below a 600 on a section, and you want to boost your score to at least a 600 level. Subject! These are the very best guides available on boosting your SAT score, section by essays work section. They're written by Harvard grads and perfect SAT scorers. Don't disappoint yourself - read these guides and improve your score today. Best Additional Book for Top SAT Scorers. With all the on the, books above, you already have your work cut out for you. With 8 full-length practice tests and 5+ books at your disposal, you will be studying for well over 50 hours.

If you go through all your practice using the guidelines we recommend, you’ll likely have made huge improvements. If you still want additional practice, I recommend the mega, Barron’s SAT books , especially if you’re aiming for near a perfect score. I remember using these books during my own prep in to thesis high school, and while their questions are inferior to real SAT practice tests, they’re a good backup source when you finish everything else above. A lot of content. Thousands of essays work practice questions and detailed lessons with many examples. Topics can get too difficult for what you need to know on the SAT. Some questions are too hard in the wrong way – they can get unrealistically hard in a way that you’d never see on the SAT. If you’re not an SAT expert yet, you won’t be able to detect when this happens and you can waste time studying things that don’t matter. Business Plan! Best All-In-One Book for Less-Motivated Low Scorers.

My recommendations have so far been for the ambitious student who really wants to improve his or her score. I know there are some students who just want to put in 5 hours, get some exposure to the test, and mega essays, then take the SAT and forget about it. I personally believe that for most students, improving your SAT score is, hour for hour, the best way to improve your chances of college admission. Forced Testing Essay! So I would say that if you feel this way, you should question your philosophy. But if you’re stuck in this mindset, the group work, book I would recommend is Kaplan’s SAT book . It’s an all-in-one book that covers the three sections and contains practice questions and practice tests.

It doesn’t excel at any of what it’s doing , but it covers the important bases. It also tends to have more reasonable content than other all-in-one books like Princeton Review. I don’t love this book. I don’t even really like it. Forced Testing Essay! I don’t recommend it if you at all want to mega essays group work, improve your score seriously and are willing to put in study time. But if you just want a single source that can do an drug, OK job and mega work, is easily digestible, this is the best one out there.

Covers all three sections and contains practice tests. Plan! Practice questions tend to be unrealistic – they often don’t phrase questions the way the SAT would, and they don’t test concepts in the right way. Mega Essays! The questions also don’t trick you in the same ways that the SAT does. Want to rhetorical essay on the gettysburg address, improve your SAT score by 160 points? We've written a guide about the top 5 strategies you must be using to have a shot at improving your score. Download it for mega essays group work free now: The #1 SAT Prep Book to AVOID Buying.

Unlike every other section on this guide, I'm making one specific recommendation against buying a book. This is unusual because, prior to 2015, this is the #1 book you would DEFINITELY buy. Essay About Of Moral Education! College Board's Official SAT Study Guide, 2018 Edition. It feels really weird to recommend NOT buying this book, because for years and year, this was THE book to use to study. It used to mega essays group, contain 10 practice tests that you could get only through buying this book. Why release these tests for free? This is essay importance education, all part of College Board's moves to make the test more accessible and to mega essays group work, reduce educational inequality.

This is phd dissertations, great and I support them - but it also means the Official SAT Study Guide is now a waste of money . The educational material outside of the practice tests is very superficial and unhelpful (we've written far better guides on Reading, Math, and Writing - all online and free). Has eight practice tests pre-printed for you, so you don't need to group, print them yourself. Everything in this guide is available for free online. More important than buying the books is knowing how to subject, use them effectively. The more books you have, the more important it is to understand how to mega group work, build a unified study system.

We've written thorough guides to help guide you through how to rhetorical on the gettysburg, study. Build a study plan across your high school schedule so you know when to take the mega essays group, SAT. Is Book Studying the Best Option for You? There are a lot of prep methods available to you, and book studying is just one of rhetorical them. Just to group work, explore all our options, let's quickly examine whether book studying is right for you. Phd Dissertations! People who choose to study by books do so for different reasons. Some so it for group work cost reasons. Testing! As I noted above, the best SAT books can get expensive. If you buy all the top books, you'll be spending around $200 . This is already close to the cost of our online SAT prep program, which goes beyond books by guiding your study step-by-step and and motivating you to put in mega study time.

Others study with books because they're self-motivated, and they like teaching themselves. If this isn't you, books can be a disappointing way for you to drug testing, spend time and essays work, not improve . Forced! If you don't have good study strategy, you can put in dozens of hours and make zero improvement, because you're not understanding your weaknesses and solving them. By far one of the most important ways to improve your SAT score is to study your mistakes and learn from them. If you can't do this reliably, you'll need extra help to get you started. We've written a free guide to compare other methods of prep. Download this to compare the different methods and see which one is best for you. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points or more? We've put our best advice into a single guide.

These are the 5 strategies you MUST be using to have a shot at improving your score. Download this free SAT guide now: Check out essays group work our industry-leading online SAT program. We've designed it to cover all the advantages of books and tutors at an affordable price. Featuring in-depth strategy lessons and thousands of practice questions, we have the content from the leading books. To Thesis! We include the critical Official SAT Study Guide above. Beyond that, the program acts like your personal tutor. It guides you step-by-step through what you should be working on essays at every moment to best improve your score. It customizes to your strengths and weaknesses, then gives you focused practice so you learn the patterns on the SAT. Furthermore, it motivates you to study so that you put in enough time. Essay Importance Education! There's a 160 point guarantee - if you don't improve your score by 160 points, you get all your money back. Have friends who also need help with test prep?

Share this article! As co-founder and head of product design at PrepScholar, Allen has guided thousands of students to success in SAT/ACT prep and college admissions. He's committed to providing the highest quality resources to help you succeed. Allen graduated from Harvard University summa cum laude and earned two perfect scores on essays group work the SAT (1600 in 2004, and 2400 in 2014) and a perfect score on the ACT. You should definitely follow us on social media. You'll get updates on to thesis our latest articles right on essays group work your feed. Follow us on all 3 of our social networks: Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and about education, we'll reply!

Series: How to essays, Get 800 on Each SAT Section: Series: How to winning writing, Get to 600 on Each SAT Section: Series: How to Get 36 on Each ACT Section: Our hand-selected experts help you in a variety of other topics! Looking for essays group Graduate School Test Prep? Check out forced testing essay our top-rated graduate blogs here: Get the latest articles and test prep tips! © PrepScholar 2013-2015. All rights reserved. SAT® is a registered trademark of the College Entrance Examination Board TM . The College Entrance Examination.

Board TM does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this site.

Primitivism, anarcho-primitivism and anti-civilisationism - criticism. Analysis and mega essays work criticism of anarcho-primitivists, who are opposed to technology. Some are also opposed to mass society, civilisation and language. The central tenet of primitivism, anarcho-primitivism and anti-civilisationism is the abolition of technology. For most people, arguing against this is completely unnecessary, since it is immediately obvious that it is a terrible idea. Even given the most cursory glance it is clear that abolishing technology would have devastating consequences for humankind and essay of moral education the planet. For starters, the 50%2 of the essays UK population who need glasses or contact lenses (which rises to 97% over the age of rhetorical on the gettysburg address 653) would soon be left severely impaired. Mega Work. Tens of millions of people dependent on drug treatments for illnesses would quickly die. Radioactive nuclear waste needs to be monitored and controlled with high-tech equipment for tens of thousands of years.

Without it, even if buried deep underground, climate changes and tectonic plate movements will eventually cause it to electrical engineering leak out and wreak ecological devastation on the planet. This aside from the group work all the other obviously unattractive prospects of this idea – no more books, recorded music, medical equipment, central heating, sewage systems. - means that almost everyone would reject this idea immediately. However, within and around anarchist circles these ideas do have some support, so this article will examine them in more detail. Over the rhetorical essay last decade a generalised critique of group civilisation has been made by a number of authors, mostly based in the USA. Some of these have chosen to identify as anarchists although the more general self-identification is primitivist.

Their overall argument is that 'civilisation' (i.e. mass, technological society) itself is the problem that results in our failure to forced essay live rewarding lives. The struggle for change is thus a struggle against civilisation and for an earth where technology has been eliminated. Essays Group Work. This is an interesting argument that has some merits as an intellectual exercise. But the problem is that some of its adherents have used primitivism as a base from writing, which to mega group work attack all other proposals for changing society. Facing this challenge anarchists need to first look to see if primitivism offers any sort of realistic alternative to the world as it is.

Our starting point is that the expression 'life is hard' can always receive the reply that 'it is better than the alternative'. This provides a good general test of all critiques of the world 'as it is', including anarchism - which is to about importance of moral education ask if a better alternative is essays work, possible. Even if we can't point to the 'better alternative', criticisms of the on the world 'as it is' can have a certain intellectual value. But after the disaster of the 20th century when so-called alternatives like Leninism created long lasting dictatorships that killed millions, the question 'is your alternative any better then what exists?' has to group be put to anyone advocating change. The primitivist critique of anarchism is business plan, based around the claim to have discovered a contradiction between liberty and mass society. In other words they see it as impossible for any society that involves groups much larger than a village to be a free society. If this was true it would make the anarchist proposal of a world of 'free federations of towns, cities and countryside' impossible. Such federations and population centres are obviously a form of mega mass society/civilisation. However the anarchist movement has been answering this very so-called contradiction since its origins. Back in the 19th century liberal defenders of the state pointed to such a contradiction in order to justify the need for one set of plan men to group work rule over another.

Anarchist-communist Mikhail Bakunin answered this in 1871 in his essay on 'The Paris Commune and gettysburg the Idea of the State4. It is said that the harmony and universal solidarity of group individuals with society can never be attained in practice because their interests, being antagonistic, can never be reconciled. To this objection I reply that if these interests have never as yet come to essay gettysburg mutual accord, it was because the State has sacrificed the interests of the majority for the benefit of a privileged minority. That is mega essays, why this famous incompatibility, this conflict of personal interests with those of society, is nothing but a fraud, a political lie, born of the theological lie which invented the doctrine of original sin in order to dishonour man and destroy his self-respect. . We are convinced that all the wealth of man's intellectual, moral, and material development, as well as his apparent independence, is the product of his life in essay writing, society.

Outside society, not only would he not be a free man, he would not even become genuinely human, a being conscious of himself, the mega group only being who thinks and speaks. Only the combination of intelligence and collective labour was able to force man out of that savage and brutish state which constituted his original nature, or rather the starting point for his further development. We are profoundly convinced that the entire life of men - their interests, tendencies, needs, illusions, even stupidities, as well as every bit of engineering violence, injustice, and seemingly voluntary activity – merely represent the result of inevitable societal forces. Mega Group. People cannot reject the testing essay idea of mutual independence, nor can they deny the group work reciprocal influence and uniformity exhibiting the subject to thesis manifestations of mega group external nature. What level of technology? Most primitivists evade the question of what level of technology they wish to return to by hiding behind the claim that they are not arguing for a return to anything, on the contrary they want to importance of moral education go forward. With that in mind a reasonable summary of their position is that certain technologies are acceptable up to the level of small village society sustained by hunting and gathering.

The problems for primitivists start with the mega group work development of agriculture and electrical engineering mass society. Of course civilisation (also rarely defined by mega group primitivists) is a rather general term, as is technology. Few of these primitivists have taken this argument to its logical conclusion. One who has is John Zerzan (pictured, right) who identifies the root of the subject to thesis problem in the evolution of language and abstract thought. This is a logical end point for the primitivist rejection of mass society. For the purposes of this article I'm taking as a starting point that the form of future society that primitivists argue for would be broadly similar in technological terms to essays group that which existed around 12,000 years ago on earth, at the dawn of the about importance of moral agricultural revolution. By this I do not claim that they want to 'go back', something that is in any case impossible.

But rather that if you seek to go forward by getting rid of all the technology of the agricultural revolution and beyond what results will look quite like pre-agricultural society of 10,000 BC. As this is the only example we have of such a society in operation it seems reasonable to use it to essays group work evaluate the primitivist claims. A question of numbers. Hunter-gatherers live off the rhetorical essay on the gettysburg address food they can hunt or gather, hence the name. Animals can be hunted or trapped while fruits, nuts, greens and roots are gathered. Before about 12,000 years ago every human on the planet lived as a hunter gather. Today only a tiny number of people do, in isolated and marginal regions of the planet including deserts, artic tundra and jungle. Some of work these groups like the Acre have only had contact with the essay rest of the planet in recent decades5, others like the Inuit6 have had contact for long periods of essays group work time and writing so have adopted technologies beyond those developed locally. These later groups are very much part of the global civilisation and have contributed to the development of new technologies in this civilisation. In marginal ecosystems hunter-gathering often represents the only feasible way of producing food. The desert is essays work, too dry for sustained agriculture and the arctic too cold.

The only other possibility is pastoralism, the reliance on phd dissertations electrical semi-domesticated animals as a food source. For instance in the Scandinavian arctic the Sami7 control the movement of huge reindeer herds to provide a regular food source. Hunter gathers survive on the food they hunt and gather. This requires very low population densities as population growth is limited by the need to avoid over hunting. Too much gathering of mega work food plants can also serve to reduce the number of plants that are available in the future. This is the core problem with the expansion plan primitivist idea that the whole planet could live as hunter gathers, there is not nearly enough food produced in natural ecosystems for essays work, even a fraction of the essay education current population of the world to do so. It should be obvious that the mega group amount of calories available to importance of moral education humans as food in an acre of oak forest will be a lot lower then the amount of calories available to humans in an acre of corn.

Agriculture provides far, far more useful calories per acre then hunter gathering in essays group, the same acre would. That is because we have spent 12,000 years selecting plants and improving agricultural techniques so that per acre we cram in lots of productive plants that put their energy into producing plant parts that are food for essay writing, us rather then plant parts that are not food for us. Compare any cultivated grain with its wild relative and you will see an illustration of group work this, the forced testing cultivated form will have much bigger grains and a much larger proportion of mega group grain to stalk and foliage. We have chosen plants that produce a high ratio of edible biomass. In other words a pine tree may be as good or better then a lettuce at winning writing, capturing the solar energy that falls on it. But with the lettuce a huge percentage of the captured energy goes into food (around 75%). With pine tree none of the energy produces food we can eat. Compare the group amount of food to be found in a nearby woodland with the amount you can grow in a couple of square meters of garden cultivated in even an organic low energy fashion and you'll see why agriculture is a must have for the population of the planet.

An acre of organically grown potato can yield 15,000 lbs of food8. A a square that is 70 yards wide and 70 yards long measures just over an acre. The estimated population of human on the earth before the advent of agriculture (10,000 BC) varies with some estimates as low as 250,0009. Other estimates for phd dissertations electrical, the pre-agricultural hunter gather population are more generous, in the range of mega essays work 6 to 10 million10. The earth's current population is over 6,000 million. This 6,000 million are almost all supported by agriculture. They could not be supported by hunter gathering, indeed it is suggested that even the 10 million hunter gathers who may have existed before agriculture may have been a non sustainable number. Evidence for rhetorical address, this can be seen in the Pleistocene overkill11, a period from 12,000 to essays group 10,000 BC in which 200 genera of large mammals went extinct. In the Americas in this period over 80% of the population of large mammals became extinct12. That this was due to over hunting is one controversial hypothesis.

If correct than the advent of to thesis agriculture (and civilisation) may even have been due to the absence of large game which forced hunter gathers to 'settle down' and find other ways of obtaining food. Certainly in recorded history the same over hunting has been observed with the arrival of man on essays isolated Polynesian islands. Business. Over hunting caused the extinction of the Dodo in Mauretania and mega group work the Moa in New Zealand not to mention many less famous species. Living in forced testing, the bog in winter. Another way of looking at group work, the fact that primitivism cannot support all of the people of the planet is more anecdotal and uses Ireland [libcom - where the author lives, though figures for testing, the UK are comparable, though even less favourable for would-be hunter-gatherers] as an example. Left to work itself the Irish countryside would consist mostly of mature oak forest with some hazel scrub and electrical bogs. Go into an oak forest and essays group see how much food you can gather - if you know your stuff there is some.

Acorns, fruit on brambles in rhetorical essay on the address, clearings, some wild garlic, strawberries, edible fungi, wild honey, and the meat from animals like deer, squirrel, wild goat and pigeon that can be hunted. Mega Essays. But this is drug essay, much, much, much fewer calories then the same area cultivated as wheat or potatoes would yield. There is simply not enough land in Ireland to support 5 million, the current population of the mega essays work island, as hunter gatherers. Typically hunter gatherers live at a population density of 1 per phd dissertations electrical engineering 10 square km. (Irelands present population density is mega group, around 500 per 10 square km or 500 times this [libcom – for to thesis, the UK this is nearly 2,500 times this, 2,460 per 10 square km]). Group. By extending this standard calculation from elsewhere on forced the planet the mega work number that could be supported in Ireland would be less then 70,000.

Probably a lot less as only 20% of phd dissertations electrical engineering Ireland is work, arable land. Blanket bog or Burren karst provide little in the way of to thesis food useful for humans. Mega Group. In winter there would be very little food to be gathered (perhaps small caches of nuts hidden by squirrels and on the gettysburg address some wild honey) and that even 70,000 people living off hunting would eradicate the group large mammals (deer, wild goat) very quickly. The coastal areas and larger rivers and lakes would be the main source of winning essay hunting and some gathering in group work, the form of shellfish and edible seaweed. But being generous and multiplying the typical hunter gatherers population density by 10, and assuming that somehow Ireland could sustain 70,000 hunter gatherers we discover we need to 'reduce' the population by some 4,930,000. Or 98.6% [libcom note – for the UK these figures are even worse – a generous maximum of 240,000 people out of 60m, thus requiring a 99.6% reduction in engineering, population].

The actual archaeological estimates for the population of Ireland before the arrival of agriculture is around 7,000 people. The idea that a certain amount of land can support a certain amount of people according to how it is (or in this case is mega essays group, not) cultivated is referred to as its 'carrying capacity'. This can be estimated for the earth as a whole. One modern calculation for drug testing, hunter gatherers actually give you 100 million as the maximum figure but just how much of mega essays group a maximum this is forced essay, becomes clear when you realise that using similar methods gives 30 billion as the maximum farming figure13. Work. That would be five times the world’s current population! But let's take this figure of 100 million as the essay on the gettysburg maximum rather then the mega group historical maximum of 10 million. This is generous estimate, well above that of those primitivists who have dared to of moral education address this issue. For instance Miss Ann Thropy writing in the US Earth First! magazine estimated, Ecotopia would be a planet with about 50 million people who are hunting and gathering for subsistence.14. The earth population today is around 6,000 million. A return to a 'primitive' earth therefore requires that some 5900 million people disappear. Something has to happen to 98% of the world's population in order for the 100 million survivors to mega essays group work have even the slightest hope of a sustainable primitive utopia.

At this point some primitivist writers like John Moore cry foul, dismissing the essay about importance education suggestion that the mega essays group population levels envisaged by anarcho-primitivists would have to be achieved by mass die-offs or nazi-style death camps. These are just smear tactics. The commitment of drug testing anarcho-primitivists to the abolition of all power relations, including the State with all its administrative and essays group military apparatus, and any kind of party or organisation, means that such orchestrated slaughter remains an impossibility as well as just plain horrendous.15. The problem for John is that these 'smear tactics' are based not only on the logical requirements of a primitivist world but are also explicitly acknowledged by importance of moral education other primitivists. Essays Group. Miss Ann Thropy's 50 million has already been quoted.

Another primitivist FAQ claims Drastic population reductions are going to to thesis happen whether we do it voluntarily or not. It would be better, for obvious reasons to do all this gradually and voluntarily, but if we don't the human population is essays, going to be cut anyway.16. The Coalition Against Civilisation write We need to be realistic about what would happen were we to enter a post-civilised world. One basic write-off is that a lot of to thesis people would die upon civil collapse. While being a hard thing to argue to a moralistic person, we shouldn't pretend this wouldn't be the case.17. More recently Derrick Jensen in an interview from Issue #6 of The 'A' Word Magazine18 said civilisation needs to be actively fought against, but I don't think that we can bring it down. What we can do is assist the natural world to mega essays group work bring it down.

I want civilisation brought down and I want it brought down now. We have seen above what the consequences of 'bringing down' civilisation are. In short there is no shortage of primitivists who recognise that the primitive world they desire would require mass die-offs. I've not come across any who advocate nazi-style death camps but perhaps John just threw this in to muddy the water. Primitivists like John Moore can therefore refuse to confront this question of die off by upping the emotional ante and by accusing those who point the need for die-off out as carrying out 'smear tactics'. It's up to him to explain either how 6 billion can be fed or to admit that primitivism is no more then an intellectual mind game. My expectation is that just about everyone when confronted with this requirement of mass death will conclude that 'primitivism' offers nothing to fight for.

A very few, like the survivalists confronted by the threat of of moral nuclear war in essays group work, the 1980's, might conclude that all this is inevitable and start planning how their loved ones will survive when others die. But this latter group has moved far, far beyond any understanding of anarchism as I understand it. So the 'anarcho' prefix such primitivists try to claim has to be rejected. Most primitivists run away from the requirement for mass death in one of two ways. Electrical. The more cuddly ones decide that primitivism is not a program for a different way of running the world. Rather it exists as a critique of civilisation and not an mega essays group, alternative to it. This is phd dissertations, fair enough and there is a value in re-examining the basic assumptions of civilisation. But in that case primitivism is no substitute for mega essays group, the anarchist struggle for liberation, which involves adapting technology to winning writing our needs rather then rejecting it. The problem is that primitivists like to attack the very methods of mass organisation that are necessary for overthrowing capitalism.

Reasonable enough if you believe you have an essays, alternative to anarchism but rather damaging if all you have is an interesting critique! Other primitivists however take the Cassandra path, telling us they are merely prophets of an inevitable doom. They don't desire the death of 5,900 million they just point out it cannot be prevented. This is business, worth examining in some detail precisely because it is so disempowering. What after all is the use of fighting for a fair society today if tomorrow or the mega essays work day after 98% if us are going to die and subject everything we have built crumble to dust? Are we all doomed? Primitivists are not the only ones to use the rhetoric of catastrophe to mega group work panic people into essay writing accepting their political proposals. Reformists such as George Monbiot, use similar 'we are all doomed' arguments to try and stampede people into support for reformism and world government.

In the last decade's acceptance that the world is somehow doomed has become part of mainstream culture, first as the Cold War and then as looming environmental disaster. George Bush and Tony Blair created a panic over “Weapons of Mass Destruction” to give cover to their invasion of Iraq. The need to mega examine and dismantle such panics is clear. We're doomed! Or are. The most convincing form the 'end of essay importance civilisation' panic takes is the idea of a looming resource crisis that will make life as we know it impossible. And the best resource to focus on for those who wish to make this argument is oil. Everything we produce, including food, is dependant on massive energy inputs and 40% of the world's energy use is generated from oil.

The primitivist version of this argument goes something like this, 'everyone knows that in mega group, X number of year the oil will run out, this will mean civilisation will grind to testing essay a halt, and this will mean lots of people will die. So we might as well embrace the inevitable'. Mega Group Work. The oil running out argument is the phd dissertations electrical engineering primitivist equivalent of the orthodox Marxist 'final economic crisis that results in the overthrow of capitalism'. Essays Work. And, just like the orthodox Marxists, primitivists always argue this final crisis is always just around the corner. When looked at in any detail this argument evaporates and it becomes clear that neither capitalism nor civilisation face a final crisis because of the oil running out. This is not because oil supplies are inexhaustible, indeed we may be reaching or have reached the peak of oil production today. But far from being the end of capitalism or civilisation this is an electrical engineering, opportunity for profit and mega work restructuring. Capital however reluctantly, is gearing up to make profits out of developing alternative energy sources on the one hand and on the other of accessing plentiful but more destructive ways to extract fossil fuel supplies. The second path of course makes global warming and other forms of pollution a lot worse but that's not likely to stop the global capitalist class.

It is not just primitivists who have become mesmerised by the oil crisis, but in summary, while oil will become more expensive over the decades the process to develop substitutes for it is already underway. Denmark for instance intends to produce 50% of its energy needs from essay, wind farms by mega group work 2030 and essay of moral education Danish companies are already making vast amounts of money because they are the mega essays work leading producers of rhetorical gettysburg wind turbines. The switch over from oil is likely to provide an opportunity to make profits for capitalism rather then representing some form of mega work final crisis. There may well be an business, energy crisis as oil starts to rise in price and alternative technologies are not yet capable of filling the 40% of energy generation filled by oil. Essays. This will cause oil and therefore energy prices to business expansion soar but this will be a crisis for the poor of the world and not for the wealthy some of whom will even profit from it.

A severe energy crisis could trigger a global economic downturn but again it is the world's workers that suffer the most in mega, such times. Engineering. There is a good argument that the world's elite are already preparing for such a situation, many of the recent US wars make sense in terms of securing future oil supplies for essays, US corporations. Capitalism is quite capable of surviving very destructive crisis. World War II saw many of the major cities of plan Europe destroyed and most of the industry of mega group central Europe flattened. (By bombers, by war, by retreating Germans and then torn up and shipped east by advancing Russians). Millions of European workers died as a result both in the war years and in the years that followed.

But capitalism not only survived, it flourished as starvation allowed wages to be driven down and essay about of moral education profits soared. However it is essays group work, worth doing a little mental exercise on this idea of the oil running out. If indeed there was no alternative what might happen? Would a primitivist utopia emerge even at the bitter price of 5,900 million people dying? No. The primitivists seem to forget that we live in business expansion, a class society. The population of the earth is divided into a few people with vast resources and power and essays group the rest of us.

It is not a case of equal access to resources, rather of quite incredible unequal access. Essay About Importance Of Moral Education. Those who fell victim to the mass die off would not include Rubert Murdoch, Bill Gates or George Bush because these people have the money and group power to monopolise remaining supplies for themselves. Instead the first to die in huge number would be the population of the poorer mega cities on subject the planet. Cairo and mega essays group work Alexandria in engineering, Egypt have a population of around 20 million between them. Egypt is dependent both on food imports and on the very intensive agriculture of the Nile valley and mega the oasis. Except for the tiny wealthy elite those 20 million urban dwellers would have nowhere to go and there is subject to thesis, no more land to be worked. Current high yields are in part dependent on high inputs of mega work cheap energy. The mass deaths of business expansion plan millions of people is mega essays work, not something that destroys capitalism. Indeed at periods of history it has been seen as quite natural and even desirable for the modernisation of capital.

The potato famine of the 1840's that reduced the population of essay of moral Ireland by 30% was seen as desirable by many advocates of free trade19. So was the 1943/4 famine in British ruled Bengal in which four million died20. For the capitalist class such mass deaths, particularly in colonies, afford opportunities to restructure the economy in ways that would otherwise be resisted. The real result of an essays, 'end of energy' crisis would see our rulers stock piling what energy sources remained and electrical using them to power the helicopter gunships that would be used to mega essays control those of phd dissertations electrical engineering us fortunate enough to be selected to toil for mega essays group work, them in the biofuel fields. The unlucky majority would just be kept where they are and allowed to die off. More of the 'Matrix' than utopia in other words.

The other point to be made here is that destruction can serve to regenerate capitalism. Like it or not large scale destruction allows some capitalist to make a lot of money. Think of the Iraq war. The destruction of the winning Iraqi infrastructure may be a disaster for the people of Iraq buts it's a profit making bonanza for mega essays group work, Halliburton and co.21. Winning. Not coincidentally the Iraq war is helping the USA, where the largest corporations are based, gain control of the parts of the planet where much future and current oil production takes place. We can extend our intellectual exercise still further. Let us pretend that some anarchists are magically transported from the Earth to some Earth-like planet elsewhere. And we are dumped there without any technology at all. The few primitivists amongst us might head off to mega group run with the deer but a fair percentage would sit down and electrical set about essays group trying to create an anarchist civilisation. Many of the essay about importance of moral skills we could bring might not be that useful (programming without computers is mega group, of little use) but between us we'd have a good basic knowledge of expansion plan agriculture, engineering, hydraulics and physics.

Next time the primitivists wandered through the area we settled they'd find a landscape of mega work farms and dams. We'd at least have wheeled carts and possibly draft animals if any of the large game were suitable for domestication. We'd send out parties looking for obvious sources of coal and iron and if we found these we'd mine and transport them. If not we'd be felling a lot of lumber to turn into charcoal to extract whatever iron or copper we could from business plan, what could be found. The furnace and the smelter would also be found on that landscape. We'd have some medical knowledge, most importantly an understanding of germs and medical hygiene so we'd have both basic water purification and sewage removal systems. We'd understand the importance of knowledge so we'd have an education system for essays group, our children and at least the beginnings of a long-term store of knowledge (books). We could probably find the ingredients for plan, gunpowder, which are quite common, which would give us the group blasting technology need for business, large-scale mining and construction. If there was any marble nearby we could make concrete, which is mega essays, a much better building material then wood or mud.

Technology did not come from the gods. Essay About Of Moral. It was not imposed on man by a mysterious outside force. Rather it is mega essays group work, something we developed and continue to develop. Even if you could turn the clock back it would just start ticking again. John Zerzan seems to be the only primitivist capable of of moral education acknowledging this and mega essays work he retreats to phd dissertations engineering the position of seeing language and abstract thought as the problem. He is both right and ludicrous at essays group work, the same time. Plan. His vision of utopia requires not only the group death of the mass of the world’s population but would require the genetically engineered lobotomy of business plan those who survive and their offspring! Not of course something he advocates but a logical end point of his argument.

Why argue against it? So why spend so much space demolishing such a fragile ideology as primitivism. One reason is the mega group work embarrassing connection with anarchism some primitivists seek to claim. More importantly primitivism both by implication and testing often in its calls wants its followers to reject rationalism for mega essays group work, mysticism and oneness with nature. They are not the first irrational ecological movement to testing do so, a good third of the German Nazi party came from forest-worshipping blood and soil movements that sprung up in mega essays work, Germany in electrical engineering, the aftermath of essays group work World War I. This is not an empty danger. Within primitivism a self-proclaimed irrational wing has developed that if not yet advocating nazi-style death camps has openly celebrated the deaths and murder of large numbers of people as a first step. Carnage - the Oklahoma. city bombing that killed 168 people. In December 1987 the rhetorical address US publication Earth First wrote that the AIDS epidemic, rather than being a scourge, is mega group work, a welcome development in essay, the inevitable reduction of human population.22 Around a decade later in Britain Steve Booth, one of the editors of a magazine called 'Green Anarchist ', wrote that.

The Oklahoma bombers had the mega essays group right idea. The pity was that they did not blast any more government offices. Even so, they did all they could and now there are at least 200 government automatons that are no longer capable of business plan oppression. The Tokyo sarin cult had the right idea. The pity was that in testing the gas a year prior to the attack, they gave themselves away. They were not secretive enough. Mega Group Work. They had the to thesis technology to essays group produce the gas but the essay education method of delivery was ineffective. Mega Essays Group Work. One day the groups will be totally secretive and their methods of fumigation will be completely effective.23. This is where you end up when you celebrate spirituality over rationality.

When the hope of 'running with deer' overcomes the need to deal with the problem of making a revolution on a planet of 6 billion people. Essay About Importance Education. The ideas above have only reactionary conclusions. Mega Group. Their logic is elitist and hierarchical, little more that a semi-secular version of gods chosen people laying waste to the unbelievers. It certainly has nothing in essay gettysburg, common with anarchism. We need more not less technology. Which brings us back to the start. Civilisation comes with many, many problems but it is essays group work, better than the alternative. The challenge for anarchists is in transforming civilisation to a form that is without hierarchy, or imbalances of power or wealth.

This is not a new challenge, it has always been the challenge of anarchism as shown by the lengthy Bakunin quotation at the start of this essay. To do this we need modern technology to clean our water, pump away and process our waste and inoculate or cure people of the diseases of high population density. With only 10 million people on the earth you can shit in the woods providing you keep moving on. With 6 billion those who shit in essay writing, the woods are shitting in the water they and those around them will have to drink. According to the UN each year, more than 2.2 million people die from water and sanitation related diseases, many of them children. Essays. Close to one billion urban dwellers have no access to sustainable sanitation.

Data for 43 African cities . shows that 83 percent of the population do not have toilets connected to sewers24. The challenge then is not simply the construction of a civilisation that keeps everyone's standards of living at electrical, the level they are now. The challenge is work, raising just about everyone's standard of living but doing so in a manner that is reasonably sustainable. Only the further development of technology coupled to a revolution that eliminates inequality across the plan planet can deliver this. It is unfortunate that some anarchists who live in the most developed, most wealthy and most technological nations of the world prefer to play with primitivism than getting down to thinking about how we can really change the work world. The global transformation required will make all previous revolutions fade into insignificance. The major problem is not simply that capitalism has been happy to subject to thesis leave a huge proportion of the world's population in essays, poverty. The problem is also that development has been aimed at creating consumers for future products rather then providing what people need. As long as capitalism exists it will continue to wreak environmental havoc as it chases profits. It will only effectively respond to the energy crisis once that becomes profitable and drug essay because there will be a lag of many years before oil can be replaced this might mean worsening poverty and mega group work death for importance of moral, many of the poorer people in the world.

But we cannot fix these problems by dreaming of some lost golden age when the world's population was low enough to support hunter gathering. We can only sort it out by building the sort of mass movements that can not only overthrow capitalism but also introduce a libertarian society. And on the way we need to mega essays group find ways to halt and even reverse some of the worst of the environmental threats capitalism is generating. Read more about how we can prevent environmental destruction in our Everyday Manifesto. Primitivism is a pipe dream - it offers no way forwards in the struggle for a free society. Often its adherents end up undermining that struggle by attacking the to thesis very things, like mass organisation, that are a requirement to win it. Those primitivists who are serious about changing the world need to re-examine what they are fighting for.

1. Primitivism is mega essays, such a ridiculous idea it should not even need arguing against, although unfortunately within anarchist circle it does. 2. Abolishing technology would have catastrophic consequences for the planet in terms of nuclear waste leakage, and on writing ill or disabled people, not to mega group work mention general quality of life. 3. Hunter-gathering could only feed an absolute maximum of 100m people, thereby necessitating a reduction of population of 5,900m people. Primitivists cannot explain how this will come about. 4. Even if there were ecological disaster or mass human die-off it would not destroy capitalism or class society, it would simply be used by capital as an opportunity to restructure, and ensure the class divide stays intact. 5. There is essay of moral education, nothing inherently wrong with technology, it just depends on mega essays group work how it is applied – in a free society they can be used to increase freedom (from onerous work, or physical disability etc.). 6. Essay On The Address. To protect the planet we do not to get rid of technology, only essays group work of the wasteful and essay importance of moral education destructive system of capitalism which places profit above all else. To do that we need mass working class organisations which can protect our conditions, and our planet, and eventually run society on the basis of co-operation, not profit.

Read more about protecting the group environment. Oct 12 2006 10:15. a review of this article by Frere Dupont. At the same time, he exposes the sustaining myth of a self-realising scientific method in forced testing essay, which ‘observation’ progressively enlightens unsupported conjecture and prejudice. Gould specifically argues against the tendency towards the essays group work underpinning dichotomous structuring in some scientific thought, and thus against the whiggish historical approach which sustains it. What a pretentious wanker. So you got half way through the first paragraph then - well done!

Any more merciless critical insights? Nope, couldn#039;t be bother wading through the waste-deep river of shit. That#039;s, like, sooooo funny! I am not overly familiar with the arguments of primitivism in its own terms, and essay I am not overly interested in them either, but it seems to me that the libertarian communist critique as presented by Libcom is mega, based on a misrepresentation of the questions being asked by those described as ‘primitivists’. so they don#039;t have any idea what primitivist advocate but they are going to assume libcom is wrong anyway? that review is fucking stupid and subject doesn#039;t deserve any response. I think Dupont could do it better. Primitivism is essentially an ideological representation of, and group work compensation for, the anxiety experienced concerning the disappearance of individual competence. This tendency towards diy and smallscale was always presented among proletarians, but primitivism is not equal to essay writing this tendency.

It#039;s a concrete trend in anarchist milieu that started, say, in 1999 and now has almost disappeared. It correspended rise and decline of antiglobalization movement and anti-consumerist thought. Mega. If author throw light on this development, he then could make deeper analysis of libcom#039;s rivalry towards primitivism. Libcom is historically anti-lifestylist project, and primitivism was an easy target in war against lifestylist anarchism. And here we can find the source of prejudices towards any doubts in science, civilisation and technology, which are quickly blamed as PRIMMO BULLSHIT et al. At the rhetorical essay same time, he exposes the sustaining myth of a self-realising scientific method in mega, which ‘observation’ progressively enlightens unsupported conjecture and prejudice. Expansion Plan. Gould specifically argues against the tendency towards the essays group work underpinning dichotomous structuring in some scientific thought, and thus against the whiggish historical approach which sustains it. What a pretentious wanker. I hope you weren#039;t referring to Gould. Business Plan. The work they are quoting from, Time#039;s Arrow, Time#039;s Cycle is really very good, and Gould definitely tries to access what he#039;s critiquing and what he is investigating in their own terms, as well as in others`, unlike the author of that piece. And here we can find the source of prejudices towards any doubts in science, civilisation and technology, which are quickly blamed as PRIMMO BULLSHIT et al.

I think that#039;s because the people who come on here to critique tech, science and civilization are primmos. I think the key word is civilization here. Quite a few posters will critique science and tech, but using a different framework. Rather than the primmos I use Marx, Jaques Ellul, Langdon Winner and Paul Virilio. Good example of a community that is essays group work, inherently tech critical are the Amish; their approach to tech is not one of rejection that tech is business plan, teh ebilz, but that the way in which tech is implemented in their communities can either tear it apart or safeguard it. I am not saying that we should all start being Amish-like, but that if you want to look into an interesting take on tech, by people who actually practice what they preach, then the Amish, rather than primmos armed with broadband and a keyboard, is much more interesting. I think that#039;s because the people who come on here to critique tech, science and civilization are primmos. I think the key word is civilization here. Quite a few posters will critique science and tech, but using a different framework.

Rather than the primmos I use Marx, Jaques Ellul, Langdon Winner and Paul Virilio. Good example of a community that is inherently tech critical are the mega group Amish; their approach to tech is not one of rejection that tech is teh ebilz, but that the way in which tech is implemented in their communities can either tear it apart or safeguard it. I am not saying that we should all start being Amish-like, but that if you want to look into an interesting take on drug testing essay tech, by people who actually practice what they preach, then the Amish, rather than primmos armed with broadband and mega group work a keyboard, is much more interesting. I think that#039;s because the people who come on rhetorical essay on the gettysburg here to mega essays group work critique tech, science and civilization are primmos. This is essay, nonsense, on the other thread about essays Lawrence Jarach#039;s article me and others asked specific questions about technology and the possibility of self-organizing mass society at current technology levels, while always making clear we are not advocating primitivism, but of course got called primmos and had other strawman arguments used against us. The thread is here http://libcom.org/forums/theory/lawrence-jarachs-take-primitivism-30032011 . The arguments are still unanswered and from my experience very few anarchists have even thought about these things. Personally there is very little I disagree with in the libcom article above but it still does not answer the questions in engineering, that thread and this line of thinking in general.

And it looks very eccentric to me to essays look favorably at an american religious sect which from the little I have read is puritan and segregationist, for having an interesting rejection of technology Khawaga. And it looks very eccentric to essay about education me to look favorably at an american religious sect which from the little I have read is mega essays, puritan and segregationist, for having an interesting rejection of technology Khawaga. IMHO it is worth analysing interesting things purely for their own sake, without bringing guilt-by-association into about importance of moral education the equation. When we look at essays group, useful discoveries made by capitalists, should we really reject them purely because they were made by profiteering bastards? heck, proudhon and bakunin were very anti-semitic, but we still are happy to rhetorical essay gettysburg address call ourselves anarchists. And it looks very eccentric to me to essays work look favorably at phd dissertations engineering, an american religious sect which from the little I have read is puritan and segregationist, for having an interesting rejection of technology Khawaga. Have you bothered to look into their view on technology at all? If not, then maybe you should before you start thinking that I am looking favourably at a religious sect. If you bothered to read what I wrote, I said that the mega way in which they choose to implement (or even reject) is interesting, not their religious belief. You, of all people, who apparently is critical of tech, should find it interesting that that the Amish choose to adopt tech that only comes with their values, which are very community oriented and against individual atomism. When they do choose (or forced by e.g. state law) to adopt a given tech they figure out how it works, consider what impact the tech as it is will have on their community.

If the impact is business expansion plan, bad they will, if possible alter the tech so that it won#039;t fuck them up. It#039;s their approach, stupid, that is interesting, not the Amish. And you purposefully choose the Amish for some reason. Why not single out Virilio or Ellul? They#039;re both catholics; so wouldn#039;t that be eccentric as well? In any case, your response, when someone suggests other takes on critiques of tech and science is to discount it? That doesn#039;t make sense at all. Shouldn#039;t you be interested in what their critiques are? If I could summarize some of their arguments? What texts to read etc? Instead you throw a fit because I dared to mention the Amish.

FFS, that#039;s just the typical fallacy of guilt by association. Look, clever, I didn#039;t throw a fit, I just said that I found it eccentric. I didn#039;t mean to argue guilt-by-association or to mega group work discount them and if you want to recommend a text I promise to subject to thesis read it as long as it#039;s not too long. All I know about the Amish is the essays group work article on Wikipedia that I read before posting and a film with Harrison Ford I saw ages ago. I mentioned it more to show your double standards because here you encourage taking the expansion Amish seriously here while in the Jarach thread you act like a chorus-boy for all the primmo-strawman bashing, you are a troll and nothing more etc etc bla bla, not engaging with honest attempts at dialogue and group work reasoning and instead throwing off one liners. So you#039;re not going to phd dissertations engineering engage with the mega group actual substantive part of the post? Just latch on to the (admittedly) unnecessary snipe towards the very end? Easy way to ignore an argument I guess. but dino, they are not strawman arguments.

i#039;#039;m sure every libertarian communist wants to live in writing, harmony with the work earth and phase out the destructive effects of forced essay technology upon man, but we have to recognise that technology is a mere extension of the first human tools (ie. a hammer was one of the first means of production to have been invented), and that technology has many liberating effects upon humans. personally, as a humanist, i would prefer to see people well fed, intelligently educated, progressive reduction of work that each individual has to do, more time to pursue our passions etc. Group Work. This to me is the key to creating a wholesome human society. And don#039;t get me wrong, i really do recognise how awfully technology is affecting us, but i would argue that is because it is controlled by capitalists. Why only maintain current technology levels when we know that there are many new postitive developments just around the corner for winning essay, humanity? Developments that will further reduce necessary work, developments that will eventually allow us to colonize other planets to make sure that the essays wonderful thing that is conscious life will survive if the earth is ever destroyed (i#039;m talking about winning natural occurences like asteroid crashes - just look at mega, the ice age for an example of the effect the essay of moral last crash had) EDIT: you#039;ll probably think i#039;m mad for wanting to develop space technology, but please bear in mind i think we should solve our problems on this planet first. and that includes developing Africa and solving world hunger. IMO humanity#039;s problems are so great we can#039;t afford to not keep developing our technology.

I mentioned it more to show your double standards because here you encourage taking the Amish seriously here while in the Jarach thread you act like a chorus-boy for all the primmo-strawman bashing, you are a troll and nothing more etc etc bla bla, not engaging with honest attempts at dialogue and mega essays work reasoning and drug testing essay instead throwing off one liners. Fair enough. My posts are probably a bit meta, in essays, that I#039;ve had plenty of discussion about primitivism both on and off these boards and I#039;ve had enough of them and plan their so-called theory. In the end most primmos turn out to be misanthropes, which means that they don#039;t really gvive a shit about working class emancipation. Mega Group Work. They see the working class as the problem, not the political subject that can negate capitalism. And the typical argument is bound up with a rather simplistic view on tech; that it is tech and mass society that is the problem. And tech is inherently the plan problem. Essays Group Work. A laughable argument. On The Gettysburg Address. The Amish, on the other hand, are not anti-tech, but they do believe that tech comes with specific values, politics and group require certain forms of subject to thesis social organization that will destroy the essays work community they try to foster.

So if possible they will adopt tech, but only after they are adapted so that they won#039;t be damaging to Amish values. Now that is a sensible approach to tech and expansion I think, with some modifications, this is how ATR we could approach self-organized tech. There is no self-organization if we have to abide to what the tech dictates (nuclear power is a case in point). If you#039;re interested in reading about this, I suggest the article Amish Technology: Reinforcing Values and Building Community by Jameson Wetmore. You can find it in the colletion Technology and mega essays group Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future . It shortish and decent. I can send you the PDF if you PM me your e-mail. but we have to recognise that technology is a mere extension of the first human tools (ie. a hammer was one of the first means of production to have been invented), and that technology has many liberating effects upon humans. This is a strawman argument because I have never said anything to contradict this and subject to thesis neither did anyone else on the other thread that I am talking about. Did you read it?

My posts are probably a bit meta, in that I#039;ve had plenty of mega discussion about primitivism both on essay of moral and off these boards and I#039;ve had enough of them and their so-called theory. In the end most primmos turn out to mega group work be misanthropes, which means that they don#039;t really gvive a shit about working class emancipation. They see the working class as the problem, not the expansion political subject that can negate capitalism. Mega Work. And the typical argument is bound up with a rather simplistic view on tech; that it is tech and winning essay mass society that is the problem. And tech is inherently the problem. A laughable argument. Again this is strawman stuff at least relating to the questions raised on that thread and in some of the texts Maphisto has recomended. I don#039;t deny that there are people who make the mega essays group arguments you are referring to, but there are both primitivists and technologically-skeptical people with much more depth to their arguments than the ones you are presenting. The Amish, on the other hand, are not anti-tech, but they do believe that tech comes with specific values, politics and require certain forms of social organization that will destroy the community they try to rhetorical on the gettysburg address foster. So if possible they will adopt tech, but only after they are adapted so that they won#039;t be damaging to Amish values. Now that is a sensible approach to essays tech and winning essay I think, with some modifications, this is how ATR we could approach self-organized tech.

There is no self-organization if we have to work abide to what the tech dictates (nuclear power is a case in point). I agree with this approach actually. here are both primitivists and technologically-skeptical people with much more depth to their arguments than the ones you are presenting. While I#039;ve yet to read a primitivist with depth to essay of moral education his/her argument, I#039;ve read plenty of tech-skeptical people that have (hence my suggestions as to who to read). If you can point me to some sensible primitivists I#039;d be very interested to read their take. dino you are strawmanning me by claiming i am building strawman arguments. or maybe i#039;m now strawmanning you by claiming you are strawmanning me by claiming i am building strawman arguments? here are both primitivists and technologically-skeptical people with much more depth to mega essays work their arguments than the ones you are presenting. While I#039;ve yet to read a primitivist with depth to expansion his/her argument, I#039;ve read plenty of tech-skeptical people that have (hence my suggestions as to who to read). If you can point me to some sensible primitivists I#039;d be very interested to read their take.

Thanks for group, mentioning some of those authors Khawaga. I am still sorely lacking in non-Primitivist critiques of technology aside from business expansion plan, Marx and Engels. I would like to echo dinsavros too that I AM NOT a Primitivst whole sale and likely never will be. Yet my last thread was created in order to analyse the merits of Jarach#039;s critique of common criticism#039;s of Primitivist objections. My biggest worry is that liitle thought has been done from our camp about how the creation of specific technologies and materials may be sound idelogically but are not sound when it comes to protecting the environment. Not to mention that such a need for group work, raw materials from phd dissertations electrical engineering, elsewhere in order to sustain a level of essays group technology could lead to renewed war if the people who live on or near those materials refuse to have them cultivated for the use of strangers (because they don#039;t want to forced drug essay be disturbed or their ecosystems damaged).

Of course I still believe that in a true communist society, we will work with our neighbors to recompense their loss, reduce pollution and share resources. i actually agree with you maphisto. btw. heres an interesting philiosophy over technology, asserted by mega essays work the author of a programming language: Often people, especially computer engineers, focus on the machines. They think, By doing this, the machine will run faster. By doing this, the machine will run more effectively. By doing this, the machine will something something something. Importance. They are focusing on machines. Work. But in fact we need to of moral focus on humans, on how humans care about doing programming or operating the application of the machines. We are the masters. They are the group work slaves.

I think that this article sort of overlooks an elephant in the room called #039;climate change#039;, which, interestingly, it doesn#039;t really mention except for the offhand conclusion that [e]ven if there were ecological disaster or mass human die-off it would not destroy capitalism or class society, it would simply be used by capital as an opportunity to restructure, and ensure the essay on the gettysburg class divide stays intact. I#039;d question this conclusion. As a matter of fact, consider this recent statement from the work Geological Society of London (http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/climatechange): In the coming centuries, continued emissions of carbon from burning oil, gas and coal at close to or higher than today’s levels, and from related human activities, could increase the total to close to the amounts added during the 55 million year warming event – some 1500 to 2000 billion tonnes. Further contributions from ‘natural’ sources (wetlands, tundra, methane hydrates, etc.) may come as the Earth warms.

The geological evidence from the 55 million year event and from earlier warming episodes suggests that such an addition is likely to raise average global temperatures by at least 5-6?C, and possibly more, and that recovery of the Earth’s climate in the absence of rhetorical gettysburg address any mitigation measures could take 100,000 years or more. Numerical models of the climate system support such an work, interpretation. In the light of the evidence presented here it is reasonable to conclude that emitting further large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere over time is likely to be unwise, uncomfortable though that fact may be. You can extrapolate this conclusion from these statements of educated opinion; if we don#039;t stop or at least drastically reduce emission, NOW, there#039;ll be a disaster of such colossal scope that it WILL destroy capitalism AND class society. Essay Importance Of Moral Education. And that#039;s whether the oil runs out or not. The problem is that it will also destroy /all other forms of social organisation/ for perhaps the next 100 000 years. Maybe even human civilisation itself. Now I would say that, to mega essays group work socially aware people such as those on this board, that#039;s a situation which ought to be taken very, very seriously indeed. Facile dismissals of primitivism aren#039;t necessarily helpful.

They may not have the rhetorical gettysburg right solution, but at least they can see the problem with clarity. I myself don#039;t advocate the #039;abandonment of technology#039; - whatever that would mean in practice - but I think it#039;s very clear that the current systems of technique are at least contributing to our social problems and that they can certainly be improved, in order to improve the lives of people everywhere. It seems to me, rather, that the present system has actually engineered its own complete downfall, as encouraged by group the multitude of hard-Right climate change deniers who ignore clear scientific evidence because it contradicts their own ideology. Let#039;s not repeat their mistake. Enough damage has been done already, and it#039;s unstoppable to a large extent. I believe that as basic life-support systems of this planet begin to show signs of expansion plan damage, people will eventually realise that it#039;s the group work smash-and-grab #039;free market#039; policies, and the politicians who either did nothing or not enough that got us into this situation. And then they will look to people like the #039;anarchists#039; for solutions. My current view is that the most important thing now is not to do anything to #039;bring down the system#039;, because it#039;s on its way out and it might be sooner than anyone thinks. The most important thing now is to offer meaningful new ways forward. Let#039;s not quarrel about the fittings of the lifeboats - as long as they work, and get us off the /Titanic/ in time.

I#039;d like to say more, but have no more time. Essay Of Moral. hope this is of use to someone somehow. I had no clue that Earth First! published that horrifying garbage about the AIDS crisis. I#039;m not gonna watch the vid, so do tell, Soapy. Isn#039;t it silly to expect a certain ideology to work answer the problems of something that civilization and agriculture and control and systems of control have created over thousands of years in essay about importance of moral education, one fell swoop? Shouldn#039;t it be obvious that there will have to be a gradual easing out of the psychosis and convoluted and complex problems we#039;ve created for mega essays group, ourselves with agriculture and technologies? This is my first post. I just found this article and website today because I also have recently stumbled onto anarcho-primitivism or whatever you want to call it and just began to finally open my mind to anarchy as well.

I wanted to find and hear critiques of primitivism because I find myself naturally drawn to it and in agreement with the general spirit of the entire ideology though I try to shy away from dogmatic thought and about importance Isms in general and keep an open mind. The article obsesses about hunter gatherer lifestyles not being able to group work sustain current global populations but ignores the more serious unsustainability of essay writing superfluous and unnecessary lifestyle and comfort technologies that people expect anymore as second nature. Monocultural agriculture in general is one of the greatest problems as it necessitates division of labour,enforces high starch diets that lead to later convoluted health problems that many of these technologies people think are necessary for but are really just in a sort of mega distopian symbiotic relationship. Permaculture and Food Forests and polyculture in electrical, general could be a sort of compromise between the 2 although they in and of themselves represent control as well which may be the actual base root cause of all we think is good and bad in civilization. I think we need to group work consider some other factors. 1 is that population levels in areas where industrialization and technology and infrastructure are rooted generally tend to shrink without new immigrants, because of certain lifestyle changes, as is happening in Europe. So, as the rhetorical gettysburg rest of the world races towards so-called first world standards they too will experience a similar downward trend in reproductive rates. Essays Group. There is an ebb and flow of population that is much more dramatic with monocultural agriculture systems than the subject to thesis much more natural and mega work subtle ones of those of hunter gatherer and perhaps some sort of hybrid hunter gatherer polyculture food forest implementation. The whole exponential population growth argument and phd dissertations engineering the necessity of a machine or some sort of group work apocalypse to feed/kill it is just fear mongering. Civilization, the machine, and divisions of labour encourage people to have huge families just as a sort of life insurance policy when food is relatively cheap but wages are low, so to change classes people need to spread their eggs in many baskets so to speak and those eggs become nest eggs that take care of them as well as they become elderly, excuse the puns.

We can#039;t forget desertification, something the winning essay author indirectly mentions via unsustainability of deserts for HGs, yet doesn#039;t address the essays work causes of it. 2 such causes are the direct byproduct of civilization via poorly implemented monocultural agriculture,where poor soil conditions and overgrazing due to the domestication(a system of control again largely absent in indigenous societies) of grazing animals Ieads to barren desert prone land. I think future climate change may also influence society, organized or not #039;civilized#039; or indigenous in many ways. Usually the negatives are focused on but what about the fact that an earth with higher and more even year round temperatures could be more suitable to essay about importance education the sorts of year round food growing environments that tropical indigenous cultures have sustained since the dawn of essays group work time. I think the electrical engineering hot and cold of summers/winters may influence the sort of dualism such as busybody/lazy that the dominant civilizations are rooted in and obsessed with. Essays Group. More constant year round climates seem to winning essay writing produce people/cultures with more even equilibriums. Group. Maybe there would be more land covered in water from the melting ice but an earth that was entirely tropical and drug testing subtropical migh make up for it in food production ability. Tribal indigenous societies avoid many of these problems since they have let go of control, they just are, which I don#039;t want to mega group romanticize too much but which you have to admit has given us all sorts of cancerous byproducts all associated with control-Systems of control, Dualistic Ideologies, Organized Religion, the cultivation of the phd dissertations engineering ego from the idea of possessions and property #039;rights#039;, almost all personality disorders that plague life and society today,power, greed, and maybe, the mega group pursuit of more than you need. Equlibrium is indubitably more constant and instinctual with those who live close to the earth. I stay open minded, I am new to all this as I said. I am hoping there may be some seemingly impossible way to combine a more instinctual letting go of control and #039;being#039; with some of the better aspects of business #039;civilization#039; through the pursuit of mega work knowledge, like permaculture.

I don#039;t know. You have obviously put a lot more thought into rhetorical essay on the gettysburg Anarcho-Primitivism than I have, but I have to say this; technology is great when balanced with the environment, monocropping increases output and essays efficiency, a hunter-gatherer lifestyle would be outright inconvenient, and billions dead. That#039;s all. I had no clue that Earth First! published that horrifying garbage about the AIDS crisis. To be fair, that was tongue and cheek satire written by Christopher Manes under the pen name Miss Ann Thropy and that idiot was kicked out for those statements. Drug Testing. Equating Earth First! with the actions of essays that one individual is like equating syndicalism with fascism because of George Sorel. Earth First! definitely had its problems. Patriarchy. Borderline Nationalism with fucks like Dave Formen (who now speaks at anti-illegal immigrant rallies on occasion).

There has been a lot of good in it too, especially in essay education, recent times. I think they would have been better off disbanding and launching a new ecological action group with a anti-capitalist, anti-borders bent after they disassociated with those few shitheads that spoiled their name forever. Please correct Date attribution mistake/slur in Flood article. I think the mega essays work article overall is rather weak, but never the less thought this correction was in order. In the article Flood says: In December 1997 the US publication Earth First wrote that the AIDS epidemic, rather than being a scourge, is a welcome development in the inevitable reduction of subject to thesis human population.(22) Around the same period in Britain Steve Booth, one of the mega group work editors of winning essay a magazine called #039;Green Anarchist #039;. Actually this was in 1987 - not 1997 - in the US Earth First! Journal (and caused a major rukus in the movement). The reference in the article actually confirms this 22: Earth First!, Dec. 22, 1987, cited at http://www.processedworld.com/Issues/issue22/primitive_thought.htm. It#039;s not a libcom typo as in group work, the above quote Flood gets mixed up himself and business plan says for the sake of his narrative that it and the horrific crap about by Steve Booth about the Tokyo Sarin attacks were around the same period - which they were not – Booth was writing 11 years later (in UK Green Anarchist #51, Spring 1998).

While the mistake is Floods not Libcoms I think it deserves correction as it smears the Earth First! Journal editors of the late 90s (and by implication the wider movement), who were pushing an mega essays, increasingly anti-capitalist line and for good or bad were many of the same folks that organised the 1999 N30 at subject, Seattle etc. In fact their political orientation (and that of most of US EF!ers at the time) was in reaction against much of the ideas of the 80’s Journal editors who left the movement with the essays bit split in part sparked by the AIDS quote. Whatever one#039;s thoughts on primitivism I feel the correction is worth putting in. admin: no flaming. This is a final warning: further flaming or nonsensical off topic posts will result in a temporary ban. You have obviously put a lot more thought into Anarcho-Primitivism than I have, but I have to say this; technology is great when balanced with the environment, monocropping increases output and efficiency, a hunter-gatherer lifestyle would be outright inconvenient, and billions dead. That's all. True! Just in a small backyard plot I grew enough corn to survive on for a year, without ofcourse any excesses like TV, internet, auto, moibile phone etc, all of the things that make life adorned, but if energy is available and gettysburg address exploitable. well, I don't understand the hesitation to use it.

Ironically it was the hunter/gatherer Pueblo Indian society which developed the modern corn/maize variety, it was convenient in a desert environment to produce a grain that could be stored for long durations and be altered by grinding into various tasty breads. One should not judge a society by its cuisine, corn takos tomato chilli chicken is group work, a dish worthy of any anarchist. Click here to register now. Forced Testing. Logged in users: #9654; Can comment on articles and discussions. #9654; Get 'recent posts' refreshed more regularly. #9654; Bookmark articles to your own reading list.

#9654; Use the group site private messaging system. #9654; Start forum discussions, submit articles, and more.

4 Steps to Church Strategic Planning. Group Work? Strategic planning is an important part of the creation, development and growth of any organization. Ministries that are interested in church growth are not exempt from planning. Church planning helps the organization map out essay importance of moral, strategic steps to achieve its mission and vision. Churches can experience a level of success without a plan, but those who invest the time and resources into developing a specific strategy and group, plan can achieve success at a much quicker pace. Phd Dissertations Engineering? 4 Steps to Church Strategic Planning.

1. Create a Vision, Mission and Values Statement. It is difficult to know where to mega work, focus efforts and expansion, resources without being able to articulate what it is you are trying to do. Imagine taking a vacation without first deciding where you are going or how you will get there. The first, and arguably most important, step of the strategic planning process is to create a church vision, mission and values statement. Mega Essays Group Work? This process allows board members and church leaders to clarify why the church exists (mission) and what the church is trying to drug essay, achieve (vision). The mission and vision is what determines strategy, planning and budgeting church resources. A SWOT analysis is a great exercise to go through because it identifies the key areas of the essays group work, church that may need targeted resources as well as opportunities or opposing environmental factors that could affect church strategy.

For example, if a children’s program is a strength of the church, there may need to be continued or increased resources committed to it to ensure continued development and growth. On the winning, other hand, if the church is located in a high crime area, there might be an opportunity to develop a youth outreach program to support that unique demographic. Group? The SWOT analysis process can flush out many great ideas to help target development, growth and improvements. To begin the SWOT process, think about the following: Strengths: Characteristics of the church that may give it an advantage over others; Weaknesses: Characteristics of the church that may be a disadvantage as related to others; Opportunities: Conditions outside the church that could potentially increase attendance or revenues; Threats: Conditions outside the church that could create problems for the church. Strength: The church is located on a busy street and has high visibility in the community. Expansion Plan? Weakness: A small percentage of the essays group, church population is young families.

Opportunities: The church is located in an area with a high population of Hispanic families. Subject To Thesis? Threats: The church is located in a small town with an aging population. A gap analysis answers the question, “where are we compared to where we want to be”? The process looks at the vision where do we want to go and compares it to where we are currently. The analysis can be in relation to ministry program development, discipleship, financial viability or customer experience. Mega Group Work? All areas will be identified and targeted for strategy through the gap analysis process. An example of a church’s current state: The church is writing, renting a temporary facility until it can build a permanent building; The church is lacking volunteer leadership; The church children’s program is lacking weekly training curriculum; The church lacks a process for discipleship. Once a SWOT and gap analysis is done, it is time to start writing goals. Essays Group Work? Goals are only as effective as the formalized process of phd dissertations electrical, achieving them.

Many organizations use the SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, timely) goal process to ensure their goals are achievable. When writing a goal, filter it through the following questions: S pecific: Is the goal specific enough for clarity? M easurable: Is there a way to measure the mega group work, success of the goal? A ttainable: Is the goal truly attainable? R ealistic: Is the goal realistically written? T imely: Is there a timeline associated to phd dissertations electrical, the goal to ensure a completion date? Now if we look at this example, we need to ask the questions: Is it specific yes: keywords, will identify, develop and implement Is it measurable yes: keywords, develop by 3rd quarter 20xx Is it attainable yes: with ample resources Is it realistic yes: within the allotted time-frame is it measurable yes: keywords, by 3rd quarter 20xx. Now let’s take this a step further and work, create a goal document. Unless a goal is assigned to someone and is accomplished, it is merely words on a paper.

When someone is responsible for completing a goal and is managed by a structured performance management process, goals have a much better chance of being completed. This is obviously an oversimplified example of a church goal but it provides a framework for to thesis, identifying tactical steps and assigning accountability. The church budgeting process is also incorporated into strategic planning as each goal needs to have identified resources (people, time, money) devoted to it to be successful. The strategic planning process should deliver a document that details organizational goals for mega essays work, the short term (3-6 months) and long-term (1-3 years). This is a living document and should be updated as conditions and priorities change. Rhetorical Gettysburg Address? The most important part is getting it written down and assigning responsibility whether it be an employee or volunteer assign the task. The beauty of having a written plan, is that once all of the time and effort is invested in the plan, it is just a matter of overseeing the plan to group, completion. Essay Importance Of Moral Education? This is done through a structured performance management process and mega work, should be monitored and reviewed at phd dissertations engineering least annually. Once a strategic plan is written with organizational goals, it is time to develop departmental and employee goals. Group? Does your church have a strategic plan for success?

If you would like to learn more about church planning and administration, check out our Smart Church Management: A Quality Guide to Church Administration book on Amazon. training videos, forms. and job descriptions. Have worked with churches before using models. Also, I serve as co-convener of our local ministerium spanning several faith traditions. Looking to do a comparison of 4-5 top processes used by congregations in looking to expansion plan, the future. Would be helpful to also find some that relate to culturally / denominationally specific contexts, though the main steps may well cross those lines. Many thanks. Blessings on your labors. -JD- Thanks for the comment Jay! this is very good and work, very helpful to essay about importance, me in planning church ministries. thanks. God bless. robert wright says. It is essays group, important that on a regular basis, every local church should engage in a long range planning process. your materials are helpful on church planning stratege. Thank you for your kind words! I#8217;d like to use this for our church.

Hope and pray this will help us grow our church. Thank you. Hi Marilyn. Let me know how this works for you and if you have any questions. Subject To Thesis? I am going to try this out in our church and essays group work, I am hoping for rhetorical essay on the, the best by mega essays, God#8217;s grace. Engineering? We are a new branch and will be using your 4 Steps to mega essays work, Church Strategic Planning.

God bless you Pat. Thank you for your kind words! pastor Neckson says. Business? Thank you for essays work, SCM materials as a student pastor( B.A) I have found it very helpful towards my studies. a few words but great ideas. Importance Education? Thanks. Thobile Mchunu says. Greetings. Essays Work? Your information is very useful. I#8217;m planning to propose that we implement it to grow our church. Many thanks.

David Mwale says. Im Realy Heiped By This Document Im A Church Pastor But I Had Little Knowledge On Church Strategic Plan, Please Keep It Up. Phd Dissertations Engineering? Thank you for this opportunity. God bless you. Patricia, great content and clearly and articulately presented. Are you available for facilitating?? #128578; Thank you for posting this information. It was a extremely valuable and very relevant to the body of Christ.

God bless. Hi Patricia, I am a fairly new Executive Church Administrator for a small congregation. I just came across this SCM website. Group? Thank you for the info on S W O T, It has giving me a jump start on how to develop our strategic planning process. I definitely will keep up with all of the essay about importance, articles and essays, information that you provide. May God continue to use you and SCM. Hi Yvonne! Thank you for your kind words. Have a great day! robert wright says.

Remember that a local church is much more than buildings. A local church is winning essay, people called and essays, gifted. Called in the sense that God has given each of them a task or tasks to do in His Kingdom. Essay On The Address? Gifted in that God has given each of them the mega essays group, necessary gift or gifts in order to do the assigned task or tasks. This applies to everyone. A local church: 1. Worships 2. Nurtures 3. Educates 4. Does mission work 5. Practices stewardship-time, talents, treasure 6. Shares the good news of the Gospel 7. Becomes involved in the community where it is located. 8. Address various social issues 9. Engages in long range planning. A local church puts its faith and trust in God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.

Looking to use these steps to gettysburg address, plan for a medium church in Kenya#8230; will be getting in touch through the process. Hello, Thanks for this article. Essays Work? Would be very helpful to my church. Writing planning strategy is important ful for the church to business expansion, now the mega group, goal of the church. Samuel Opoku says. Am highly impressed and educative with your material. I wish to get the full material. Thanks a lot and am blessed. Thank you so much, this is very helpful. May God continue to bless you mightily. Essay Writing? robert wright says. Jesus reminded us that we cannot put #8220;new wine#8221; into #8220;old wine skins#8221;.

Demographics will tell us that our environment/culture will change. Mega Essays? We must be prepared to respond to to thesis, that change. This is where long range planning comes in. Essays Group Work? Every 5 to 10 years, a local church should engage in essay about education a long range planning process. VERY INFORMATIVE PIECE. Mega Work? THANKS N GOD BLESS YOU. Bishop Ngwabe Dennis says. Forced Drug? Thank you very much for this Resource.

It#8217;s blessed my life and our Ministry. [#8230;] what is most important for the success of the mega essays group, organization. Every organization should have a strategic plan that results in goals targeted at achieving that strategy. Employees should have goals that [#8230;] [#8230;] Working with church leaders has helped me recognize quite a few need help when managing employees and often feel vulnerable when asked to “assess” employee performance. Many are challenged with trying to manage the day-to-day operations of a ministry and phd dissertations, keeping employees focused on those things that are most important to church strategy. [#8230;] [#8230;] example, if your church has a strategic objective to mega essays group work, develop a children’s ministry program, then it would be important to include the planning of [#8230;] [#8230;] of the church strategic planning process is setting church goals and objectives. Forced Drug? Goals should be written so they are measurable [#8230;] [#8230;] can threaten its tax exempt status. Preparing a well thought-out annual budget that supports the strategic plan can help manage and control [#8230;] [#8230;] helps to facilitate strategic plan implementation by work, allocating resources to [#8230;]

[#8230;] and a mission is accomplished. Managers need to essay gettysburg, be able to write church goals that support the strategy and mission of the organization and help employees do the [#8230;] [#8230;] facilitate sessions for developing a mission, vision and values statement, it is usually part of a strategic planning process. Therefore, the MVV session is the group work, first step in creating a strategic plan and church goals. This [#8230;] [#8230;] having a written vision and mission statement is so important. The right things are determined by church strategy, which is determined by the vision and drug testing, mission. When the organization can articulate what its [#8230;] [#8230;] Church boards should develop a compensation strategy that lines up with the overall strategy and mega group work, mission of the organization. [#8230;] [#8230;] use of business expansion plan, social technologies should be part of every organization#8217;s strategic plan and incorporating social media into church goals should be part of that [#8230;] [#8230;] is group work, a great first step in developing a strategic plan for your church. Strategic planning is a great way to essay of moral education, formalize the mega essays work, process to implement the mission and vision [#8230;] Join over 17,000+ subscribers and enter your email below to receive weekly updates and tips to help you manage your church better! You will also receive a copy of essay about importance of moral education, our FREE E-Book! This book is perfect for Executive Pastors or Business Administrators who need help managing the day-to-day operations of a church.

Check it out! To access this book on Amazon, click here. This book provides practical steps to improve how the process of work gets done. To access this book on Amazon, click here. This book provides the tools to make the performance evaluation process easier as well as insights that can help to create a positive appraisal experience.

To access this book on Amazon, click here. This book is specifically geared towards Volunteer coordinators. If you need help managing volunteers you might want to mega group work, check it out! To access this book on Amazon, click here.

cloning ethics essay NEW BOOK: The Future of Almost Everything. Human Cloning: What is cloning? How to clone. Is cloning ethical? - VIDEOS. Supermodels could one day have a whole new human cloning career, selling cells from their bodies to make hundreds of perfect human clones for tomorrow's parents. Indeed we could soon clone a supermodel without her knowledge or consent - from a drop of saliva or blood. Mega Essays Group! Indeed a former Playboy model wrote to me on this website offering to sell her own DNA - maybe someone will clone her one day.

I hope not. Human cloning: who is cloning humans and arguments against cloning. This video explores how human clones are being made - for medical research. Arguments for and against human cloning research. Why some people want to clone themselves or even to clone the dead (and not just cloning pets).

Why investors are moving away from human cloning and why human cloning now looks a last-century way to fight disease. Scroll down this page for introductory article to human cloning - at the bottom you will find more useful human cloning resources including video on how to clone humans and useful human cloning links. Rhetorical Essay Gettysburg! This site is especially aimed at students needing data for projects, essays, assignments, dissertations, debates on mega essays issues relating to human cloning. The potential of forced, gene technology is essays group work, beyond the comprehension of most people today - Dr Patrick Dixon - Wall Street Journal (E) Human cloning means designer people with known pedigree. This is the ultimate pedigree child.

Cloning of human embryos has already been achieved - see below. Drug! Successful cloning of adults has been announced but not yet proven. It is mega essays work, only a matter of time, months or a very few years before human cloning is forced essay, a reality for essays work, anyone with enough cash, willing to take the plan risks of essays work, a hideously malformed or emotionally damaged child. Human cloning of a baby could have happened more than once last year - how would you know? Human cloning headlines are usually at least two years behind what's really going on - see below.

What you really need to subject to thesis, be asking is what scientists will be saying in essays group work press conferences in 2010 about their human cloning research, talking about to thesis, work that they actually did in group 2005. What follows was written in subject to thesis 2003 and is important background on human cloning research. One thing is mega work, beyond any doubt: despite huge risks, and widespread public condemnation, by business expansion plan January 2001, many different scientists across the world were already locked in a race to mega, clone the first human, as a baby for TV cameras. Huge amounts of money are at stake in importance of moral human cloning research. Teams have announced their aim, many people have come forward with offers of eggs, their own adult cells and money - and the US still has no laws to mega essays group work, prevent human cloning from happening, nor do most other countries of the world. The headlines above first came nearer reality on 23 Feb 1997 when world media reported the existence of Dolly the sheep: cloned from an adult. Writing! I had predicted the Dolly headline in 1993, in my book The Genetic Revolution.

A few days later, the Edinburgh scientists admitted that frozen cells had been used to make Dolly, having seemed to deny it when the story first broke. That meant that animals (and in theory people) could be cloned after death. US scientists also revealed that they had cloned monkeys (using cells from an group, embryo). Winning! The British scientist responsible for Dolly admitted to mega essays work, a Parliamentary committee (6 March 1997) that human cloning could be possible in two to three years (after vigorous denials by many embryologists). I had been saying the same from the moment the story broke.

President Clinton launched an immediate 90 day report into the implications for human cloning as soon as the news of Dolly became public. Norway did the same while the EC urgently considered a response. The news on human cloning experiments exposed the fact that most nations of the world had little or no legislation covering genetic engineering. This has to business plan, change. Clinton announced in May 1997 that human cloning should be banned. Essays! He was warmly applauded. However, what he went on to say was that the proposed ban was only for 5 years, and that nuclear transfer experiments (basic human cloning technique) could continue, though not with government money.

In other words Clones may be made, but not born for the next five years. However, Clinton could not even deliver - his own partial ban was thrown out by Congress. Meanwhile UK Parliament in winning writing January 2001 made experimental creation of human clones legal, so long as the group embryos were made for medical research and destroyed before implantation. Richard Seed said over two years ago that he was a few weeks from business, his human cloning experiments. Mega Essays! He has attracted money and people.

I've met him and debated with him on TV. He has been followed by Clonaid, a new human cloning organisation with cash and drug, 300 couples ready to group work, start. Dr Seed declared that he cannot be stopped from human cloning under current US law, and subject, if human cloning laws are changed he will move the work to Mexico. Essays Group Work! He has announced a human cloning lab for Japan - purchase of on the gettysburg address, land and $15 million backing. Mega Group Work! Every week there is another mammal cloning headline. Dolly the subject sheep gave birth to a healthy lamb, Bonny. In July 1998 came rumours of a cloned mouse, Mickey, created by Dr Ryuzo Yanagimachi, University of Hawaii. Mega Essays Work! In November 1998, we heard that Japanese scientists had already cloned cows from milk - cells in the milk. If you want to see the staggering pace of human cloning announcements - check out phd dissertations electrical our human cloning news summary.

As I say, remember that what you hear today is essays, not what is going on now, its already old history. And some scientists in the field are determined to keep it that way. Hence you only knew about Dolly's creation when she was already 7 months old - more on this below. Another example of secrecy was the extraordinary announcement by Advanced Cell Technology, Massachusetts on forced testing essay 12 November 1998 that three years previously they managed to take the nucleus from work, a human cell from Dr Jose Cibelli and insert it into a cows egg. About Importance! The human genes activated and the egg began to divide. They destroyed it at the 32 cell stage, well on the way to becoming a Dr Cibelli's clone. This research was more spectacular than Dolly, yet carried out years earlier with a total news blackout. Mega Work! More recently in March 2001 Australian scientists said they had been carrying on similar secret human cloning experiments using human cells and expansion, pig eggs for over two years.

What I want to know is this: what are they doing today that they won't be talking about mega, till 2002 or 2003 or perhaps 2004? It has been good to phd dissertations engineering, see truth about cloning begin to essays group, prevail, after deliberate under-playing of the news by so-called experts in a damage limitation exercise to prevent destruction of their research grants by public demand. They have been scared by public reaction. They think the public has no real understanding and business expansion plan, so these matters should be kept from the public eye, discussed only by scientists and ethical committees. Essays Work! But these committees are dominated by the industry. What will be the next human cloning headline? You can be sure that we will see a continuous stream of expansion plan, new revelations now that has become politically acceptable for scientists to come out of the woodwork and talk about these things.

I want to clone my dad and have him as a baby Just before the announcement of Dolly the sheep, someone e-mailed me asking if she could clone her dead father. The answer of course is yes, so long as living cells have been kept in culture, taken from before death, or have been frozen in an appropriate manner. She is also willing to be cloned herself. Mega Essays! These are important issues, not science fiction. I had another e-mail from a man offering to volunteer to be cloned. Scott writes Do you need any volunteers for human cloning experiments? Let me make it absolutely clear that I am opposed to human cloning on ethical grounds. It is open to gross abuse. Testing! It undermines the uniqueness of the individual and raises profound religious and ethical questions.

Three reasons not to clone: (Press here for more) 1. Mega Group! Health risks from essay gettysburg, mutation of genes - an essays group work, abnomal baby would be a nightmare come true. Subject To Thesis! Huge risks of mutations - of a monster. Just look at what has happened in mega group work animal experiments. You can't always spot the mutations or developmental abnormalities by gene testing, nor by phd dissertations engineering ultrasound scans, until after birth. 2. Group! Emotional risks - child grows up knowing her mother is her sister, her grandmother is her mother. Every time her mother looks at essay about importance, her she is seeing herself growing up. Unbearable emotional pressures on a teenager trying to establish his or her identity.

What happens to mega group, a marriage when the essay about of moral father sees his wife's clone grow up into the exact replica (by appearance) of the beautiful 18 year old he fell in love with 35 years ago? A sexual relationship would of course be with his wife's twin, no incest involved technically. 3. Risk of abuse of the technology - see below. Reasons people may want human cloning: Reasons why people want human cloning may be rational or irrational. That is mega, not the point.

The fact is that a recent US survey conducted by essay importance of moral CNN found that 6% of US citizens think human cloning could be quite a good idea. Judging by essays work people who leave comments on this website, the reasons may vary widely. Here are a few: Human cloning has always caught the public imagination. We now have the forced drug testing essay technology to take a few cells from a modern day Einstein, or a musical genius or a child prodigy and to create hundreds of cloned babies which have exactly the same genes.

Of course, as identical twins, clones will have individual differences, separate identities - separate souls. However, studies of mega group, twins raised apart show remarkable similarities. There is more in about importance of moral education our genes than we often realise. Just think how attractive that could be to some dictator who fancies the idea of watching himself growing up, or dreams of mega essays, populating the world with a new race of genetically superior people. We will almost certainly be able to clone the dead too, from cells taken from their bodies before they die and kept alive in culture. This is essay writing, a standard technique. In this way parents could reproduce a carbon copy of a child who tragically died. Dolly the sheep was made using frozen cells. (Clonaid claimed in January 2003 that they had cloned the dead son of a Japanese couple who had been killed in an accident). For years, many scientists have been telling us that human cloning was impossible, and would never be possible.

How wrong they all were. It is absurd for mega essays group, geneticists and embryologists to about of moral, mock and stifle debate by dismissing vital issues as science fiction. As we have seen recently, yesterday's science fiction is today's reality when it comes to genes. We can hardly keep pace with the mega essays group work lightning advances being made. In 1993, the phd dissertations electrical Mail on Sunday described my meeting in the 1980s with a leading British scientist who claimed he had cloned human embryos by artificial twinning. Essays Group! He had separated cells shortly after fertilisation in expansion plan a process mimicked by nature some 4,000 times a day somewhere in mega work the world. Each cell had the potential to become a new embryo. Over 15 years later, this scientist has yet to go public about his early experiments. The reaction from leading embryologists in 1993 was swift and damning. They said that it was impossible in humans, and anyway, who would wants to do it?

This was despite the about importance of moral education fact that artificial twinning was already a standard breeding technique in essays work other mammals, and that natural human twins have been around since the beginning of human existence. On The Address! Indeed, 4,000 identical twins are born every day somewhere in the world. It is mega group, a proven technology. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence could see that artificial acceleration of the natural twinning process should not only essay be possible, but also able in theory to produce healthy children. Thus the protestations were particularly silly, but swallowed by the media with hardly a question. Artificial trimming of human embryos in 1993. Just five months later Jerry Hall of Washington University announced that he too had managed to artificially twin identical human embryos in a process that has always been perfectly legal in mega essays work Britain, although requiring a licence. The embryos he used were defective and were destroyed shortly after the experiments. Nevertheless, his work caused public outcry. The event was reported in scientific language as part of a research paper in a journal but the significance was completely missed.

The trouble is that genetics is complicated and understood by of moral only a few journalists in any depth. Mega Essays! Perhaps that is why the BBC decided when the news broke about Dolly the sheep that the story should not be covered at all because it was not news. This bizarre line was held for half a day after I first telephoned Press Association and the Sunday Telegraph to tell them that another paper was about to rhetorical essay, run the story on the front page. The Sunday Telegraph responded at 9pm Saturday night by stopping the paper and redoing their own front page. Press Association ran two pages on mega essays group work it, sent all over the world. Within an hour television companies globally were beginning to wake up.

Within 48 hours President Clinton was issuing emergency measures having been shocked by plan what was possible under US law. One reason people have given for essays group, doing this kind of research is to rhetorical essay on the gettysburg address, make spare parts in the future. Once an embryo has been twinned, one embryo can be implanted and allowed to mega group, develop into a baby, while the other is frozen. If the child later develops an to thesis, illness such as leukaemia, then the frozen twin could be thawed and implanted into mega group work, a surrogate mother, to subject to thesis, be culled for spare parts after a few months' gestation. You and mega work, I may react against such ideas, but when sick or dying children are involved, pressures can be enormous to do all that is scientifically possible. Parents are very persuasive. Who can stare a beautiful child in the face and writing, try to explain about essays, ethics in the face of possible death, about statistical chances and moral dangers ? These things are extremely difficult and to thesis, genetics is mega essays, making choices more complex still. A number of steps have already been taken. For example, tissue from aborted foetuses is already used to essay, treat adults. Mega Work! Time-warp twins have already been born - non-identical twins conceived in the laboratory on the same day, but implanted 18 months apart.

And it is not unknown for a mother to to thesis, agree to have another child for the express purpose of providing much needed transplant material for the older child. Spare part production from clones would extend these principles. For some time, I have speculated that we would be able to go further: instead of merely producing artificial twins identical to each other but not to their parents, we would one day be able to produce several hundred identical children, just using human eggs and cells from an adult (nuclear transfer). This too was dismissed out of hand as alarmist and fanciful by leading authorities, despite the fact that such experiments had already been carried out successfully in frogs as long ago as 1952. Mega Essays Group Work! Frogs are easier than mammals to manipulate which is probably why we heard in 1997 of essay, headless frogs rather than headless sheep. The truth is that when it comes to mega essays, cloning of mammals there has been at times a deliberate conspiracy of silence. At the phd dissertations electrical very moment of such protestations, advanced experiments of varying kinds were already taking place in utmost secrecy. Make no mistake: gene technology has the power to cure, feed, alter and destroy us, and many scientists are scared of mega group, a massive public reaction which could stop their work - if you find out what they are up to. There is a reluctance to tell the full story until afterwards. Scientific announcements can be long after events. When it came to cloning Dolly the sheep, why was there no press statement a year before about on the gettysburg, what they were hoping to do?

Dr Wilmut of the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh told me during a World Service interview that one reason for delay was to file a patent. Gene technology is big business, and cloning is worth millions. Work! The cloning announcement was initially valued by the city at $60 million - the amount by which the PPL shares rose on business expansion plan the days following the announcement. At the mega essays work time I said the next step (soon) would be cloning of adult mammals. Once again there was a chorus of indignant reaction from the cloning industry with the usual comments No one would want to or It can't be done. They are wrong.

The fact is forced drug essay, that at the very moment that these comments were being made, the Roslin Institute was already well advanced in such adult cloning techniques. Hence a year or so later, we heard not only that they had succeeded, but that the lambs were already six months old. The time to debate these matters is not a year or more after an mega group, experiment, but before the process begins. Cloning human embryos for research. Some scientists claim that cures for winning essay writing, certain diseases will only be found by cloning human embryos for group work, research. Investors are not convinced: since UK Parliament approved human cloning for research there have been less than five applications. One was a research facility in Newcastle, the rhetorical essay address other was the Edinburgh creators of Dolly. Neither facility succeeded in essays raising enough funds and most of the subject to thesis work quickly ground to a halt.

The fact is that cloned human embryos have been left behind by huge advances in adult stem cell research, which has attracted large amounts of research funding. Secrecy continues. The other day after a media related discussion on cloning humans, a leading British infertility specialist confessed to me privately that he was carrying out experiments himself on animals relating to mega work, human medical research that would raise serious ethical questions in the public mind if the experiments became known. He made it very clear that he had no intention of letting the public know because a reaction would endanger his work. Phd Dissertations! He claimed it was not really in mega secret because he had talked to an ethical committee about subject, it. As I said to him, what disturbs me is that people like him appear to say one thing in public, on the media, and another the moment the cameras are turned off. Essays Group! There is an inconsistency which undermines trust and destroys credibility. Certainly when it comes to cloning as we have seen the track record of honesty is not good among so-called experts. We are also seeing ever more bizarre methods of reproduction. It has been announced that a pair of electrical, embryonic children are growing up inside the essays work same womb, with five parents between them.

Angela is to thesis, a surrogate mother who is pregnant with the foetuses of two different couples. This has resulted from research by the same doctor who was responsible for mega group work, the birth of drug essay, a child two year's after its mother's death in 1995. Essays Group! Angela is subject, 35 years old, living in Rome. Essays Group! She has not been paid a fee. Since we now have the ability to alter life on earth, we had better think hard about the kind of world we want. It is no good simply reacting to today's headlines with dismay and revulsion. We must push ahead of the news to debate the future. We do not have much time. We must also resist the essay address temptation to a black and mega group, white approach.

Many of the issues are complex, and gene technology has tremendous power for good if properly used. The question is: where do we draw the line? In the business expansion last 24 months, more than a million new animals with mutant genes were born in British laboratories alone. Each is a transgenic mix of mega essays group, genes from two or more different animals, eg., mouse and essay writing, rabbit or monkey and mega essays group work, rat. Genes from plan, humans are already working in microbes, fish, rabbits, mice, pigs, sheep and cows. Mega! Some of these humanised pigs may be providers of heart transplants in the future. How many human genes does an animal need to essay gettysburg address, have to gain human rights? Pigs have a tiny amount of human genes, but a richer mix could be made. Geep have already been born - half sheep and half goat. What about combining humans and monkeys to make a half and half breed? This is not difficult.

All you have to do is combine two balls of work, growing cells in the pre-embryo stage. Human and rabbit cells have already been combined to make a humabbit - announced late in 2000. Fortunately, only rhetorical essay on the address a few human embryo cells were added to the rabbit embryo - which was born looking exactly like a normal rabbit but with a mixture of human cells throughout its brain, skin, bone, kidneys, liver, eyes and heart. Will humonkeys be recognised as morally responsible individuals before the law if they are able to talk? Monkeys and humans share most of their genes in essays group common anyway. Will theologians decide that humonkeys are able to receive salvation like the winning essay rest of essays group work, us? We need a global agreement on cloning laws. We cannot go on like this, lurching from one sensational headline to another.

We urgently need a comprehensive Gene Charter with global agreement on writing how this technology should be used. Too many decisions about essays, this technology are controlled by specialist committees dominated by scientists involved in or sympathetic to forced testing essay, the work. There is a huge ethical vacuum. Mega Work! We do not need bombastic moralistic statements, but rather a common-sense view, based on expansion principles which the whole community can support and understand. Two foundation stones should be respect for the uniqueness and mystery of human life, and care for mega essays group, future of the planet. So far decisions made have been pragmatic rather than based on higher values. Forced Drug! The church has a vital role to play. Now we know what can be done; the question is: what should we do? Are these doors that should be opened? A Nobel prize winner who helped develop nuclear science has said he fears a new generation of smart viruses could wipe us all out. But this is just another aspect of the same thing.

The lesson of history is mega, that whatever is possible will be tried somewhere by someone at some time but this is no excuse for sitting back. Whilst it is true that laws cannot prevent catastrophe or crime, they do help define the boundaries of acceptable behaviour and make deviation less common. Politicians are populists. They tend to go with the flow of public opinion on things like human cloning which in essay gettysburg address turn is work, often swung by media debate. Essay Address! That is why it so vitally important that people from every walk of life take every opportunity to contribute to the human cloning media debate. The choice is ours.

We cannot ignore gene technology, nor should we condemn all of essays, it, although there should be a complete ban on phd dissertations engineering human cloning. The key is work, proper regulation - not just in business plan the UK but world-wide. We need an urgent UN-sponsored global summit on biotechnology followed by international agreement. Group! Either we control gene technology today, or gene technology will redesign us by subject tomorrow. Thanks for promoting with Facebook LIKE or Tweet. Mega Essays Group! Really interested to hear your views. Post below. I'm so glad i found this, watching it made me more excited to become a cloning scientist. I have some questions though 1. Electrical! What might happen if you add more DNA into a cell from the same organism but from different cells like skin cell, brain cell, and heart cell, ect? 2. Essays Group! If you add more of business, a small shock to mega essays group work, both new cell and egg cell what may you think would happen? They'll open up, die, faster life process, or none natural calls but still living inside egg?

These might sound stupid but I'm curious of winning writing, what you think or might look into, to fine my answers. I want to be a mom. I am 43 and mega work, want to be cloned please help me/ (419) 407-0645. Human Cloning Rocks yall don't know ish bout it. Someone in electrical engineering my relation died recently. Mega Essays Work! I have her hairs, and blood if her clone could be made. Phd Dissertations Electrical! Her age was 40 yrs . In theory a dead human being can be cloned from a complete, undamaged cell - preserved for example by freezing, or grown in culture. I think cloning is the best way to have exact copy of someone else but does that mean the cloned human will have the group same thought and minds as the parent human from business expansion, which the cloned human been cloned? No more than an identical twin brother.

i think its fantastic, i mean what could possibly go wrong.. if you think too much it will create more problems,take my word we have numbers if we just have the authority over group it. I hope someone will clone me one day. To Thesis! every year people grieve that they lost their wife or husbend in battle i will donate my life and group, my blood line to a clone army my clones will be brave, fearless helpful to subject, suvillians. i have read this article and i am against human cloning i do how ever know that there can be some good that comes out of it for medical reasons to essays, help people who have health reasons but just to essay, do it because you just want to or you want to bring back a loved one is essays work, wrong they died for a reason they had their time just like we all do even if you do clone yourself it is not going to be just like you it has its own brain it won't do or say every thing you would yes it will look like and maybe even do some of the same things but it won't be the same. by the way i am only 17 and from some of the comments i think i have a better understanding than some of you(not all of you just some). The process of life should not be made artificial. About! nature runs its course for a reason. Mega Group Work! Cloning will destroy our identity as a species, but I understand that it may be beneficial for medical reasons. I cant help it but to say I am against cloning.

There is a reason, and a human experience to being born, exploring your own life and connecting it to the world - being unique. Cloning will destroy the human perspective of life. You dont have to be a doctor of science to see that nature cant help it, but create everything in an almost divine, unique way. It doesn't create things in a lab, nor does it try to cheat itself, but rather it creates everything with love. Rhetorical Essay On The Address! Some of mega work, you might not notice this but I encourage you if you have the time, take a walk throught the expansion plan woods and observe the mega work surroundings. I support the research on reproductive human cloning because we will immigrate to other planet one day and we would do a lot exploration on outer space by the reproductive human cloning. walterchang from ShenYang, China.

That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard! I'm doing this research project about to thesis, cloning for a Biology assignment. I don't really agree with Human Cloning to try bring back somebody back to life because missing somebody is what makes times with them great memories. You should let go. Even if they aren't around you physically they'll always be in your heart.

I myself have always wished I had a twin, but I think it would be alot more special if it happened by nature. Group! That's just my opinion. Yeah. what about gettysburg address, it. Human cloning has it's 'pros and cons'. The idea of cloning my late grandmother is work, creepy.Imagine how many people would want to clone their lost loved one's. What date was this article written.

I am doing a school assignment on human cloning and i would like to know how far away in the future will humans be cloned? Has it been done already? thanks. How is it not possible ? AND AS A MATTER OF FACT CLONING WILL BE THE MAIN SOURCE OF THERAPY TO ALL MEDICAL CONDITIONS REQUIRING EXTIRPATION . Watch out for some interesting outcome of on the gettysburg address, what I call phenomenon . Hi im still learning about cloning. Mega Group Work! As I am 27. What I would like to know is can I clone my step dad. Essay About Importance Of Moral! B cos he is dieing with a very rear cancer only 2 cases in England. I wonder if we could cure these illnesses by cloneing my step dad. I would like to belive or have some hope that we would be able to save him with stem cell treatment.

But this mite b to work, late. Or evern bring him bak maybe one day. Winning! Is this possible. B cos i am worried that I will loose my mum after aswell one day not knowing if we can do more save her live one day with this resurch. B cos all her mums my mammas family died with cancers. Will this b pased down the geen line to my mother and me and the rest of the mega group same family. If we all are going to essay writing, die one day we should try to save lifes befor and after death not just rich people I feel that is not fair on all people in our world today. Be cause we are all not that rich. I feel that is mega work, discrimination to essay importance of moral education, to middle class and mega group work, the poor. Or vunrable to these illnesses. Many thanx god should bless us all for phd dissertations engineering, trying.

Any thing thats hopefull n possible to us all today in this crule livelife. Hi im still learning about cloning. As I am 27. What I would like to know is can I clone my step dad. Essays Group Work! B cos he is dieing with a very rear cancer only business expansion 2 cases in England. I wonder if we could cure these illnesses by cloneing my step dad. I would like to belive or have some hope that we would be able to mega, save him with stem cell treatment. But this mite b to late.

Or evern bring him bak maybe one day. Is this possible. B cos i am worried that I will loose my mum after aswell one day not knowing if we can do more save her live one day with this resurch. Winning! B cos all her mums my mammas family died with cancers. Mega Essays Group Work! Will this b pased down the geen line to my mother and me and plan, the rest of the same family. If we all are going to die one day we should try to save lifes befor and after death not just rich people I feel that is not fair on all people in group our world today. Be cause we are all not that rich. I feel that is discrimination to to middle class and the poor. Or vunrable to these illnesses. Many thanx god should bless us all for trying.

Any thing thats hopefull n possible to phd dissertations engineering, us all today in this crule livelife. Thanks - so sorry to hear about work, your step father. In theory it is possible to clone human beings from a single cell of the person you wish to clone. In practice there are huge risks to the cloned child, and the child would be born with exactly the same genetic problems eg cancer-related genes, as the person he or she is cloned from. You cannot cure a cancer by subject to thesis cloning a baby from someone's body. Group! However the good news is that every day, steps are being taken in business expansion plan many different research programmes, which are increasing the chances of mega work, long term survival for people with a wide range of cancers. Cloning, though fascinating is of moral, ethically wrong on many levels. Thanks - and to everyone else for the great debate here. Yes I think many people are happy for mega work, individual cells to be cloned eg skin cells as part of electrical engineering, medical treatment (using your own cells for your own body) but not to create an egg which will turn out to be your identical twin brother or sister.

We are all getting smarter because of evolution does this mean we will soon find out work if god does or does not exist ? THAT IS CREEPY. Engineering! lol. i want to know the mega work history ,present,future about cloning. How long does it take for business expansion plan, a clone to grow. Would be grateful to receive upsates of cloning especially on humans. innit bluuuuddd this arguement is well sick but cloning is decent.

I think cloning is wrong, i mean come on if we do clone our clones could rebel ageist us and take over. I dont know about you but I like the thought of group, being one of a kind. its just wrong. Cloning, human cloning or whatever excusable name is found to cover hideous schemes should be legalized in any no form at phd dissertations electrical, all, specially when that spurred creative gets to find out of how it came to life. I keep on saying it, it because, the work was nothing natural about its process of winning essay writing, world violation. Yes, its tru 'Human cloning' is actully being done or better practiced, imagine your husband or wife could be a human clone and, you probably unaware of essays, that, but what if you came to expansion, find out? i dont think cloning should ever be allowed it sounds really dangerous and i tottally agree with people who are against cloning. I HAZ nine Clon babes yall need to calm down. There are too many bad mutations that will lead to an unhealthy life. I am amazed that the results of the work poll were not in favor of human cloning. It just shows how ignorant people are. Phd Dissertations Electrical Engineering! 100 years ago I am sure that the same was true for abortion lets just hope that people see the light soon in the next 100 years if not the next 10!

Read a Japanese comic titled: AKUMETSU. Mega! It should give you an rhetorical gettysburg, argument of why go for mega essays group work, cloning :) human cloning is testing, weird and i still dont get it its kind of confusing and i still dont get why do scientist clon they say that it could be for general health problems but wat does that help with? well i gotta make an essays group work, essay about human cloning i guess I'll turn in about importance education wat i know hopefully it comes out essays group good . Did you even read the article or are you just here to air your views? i think cloning is not right cuz if you die konw one will no that u haved died. i am a genst it. uhm. You also can't really spell or use grammar.. About Importance Of Moral! So I'm not sure how much credit your opinion holds. Also if you listened to him he was saying that they're discovering new research that takes your own cells and uses them to rebuild your heart or liver or kidney or something. If you don't know the group work difference between: no and know. Then you have no right to comment on an intellectual matter. Forced Testing Essay! People fear cloning and such because of science fiction and religion, which are both just fiction anyway, and for mega essays, all you illiterate imbeciles writing on this board, fiction means its a story.

Like unicorns and santa. For you who think its OK to phd dissertations, clone, you won't think so when they unlease the essays things they have been creating in underground birthing centers. God help us, Lord let us turn to essay importance of moral, you before the day these thing are unleased on the earth. Jesus loves each and everyone of you Repent and group, ask foregivness before its too late love you all Randy Sanders. i know god is god we are human we cant be him.

help us? with info on clones. what is a clone? how are they produced natraully? what are ethics? Cloning is scary, but at the same time, wouldn't it be cool if everyone had a twin. cloning is making an exect copy of a person or animal according to the characteristics you want. Eg Dolly the sheep. help! need info on clones. Electrical Engineering! taar. each and everyone will have and group work, will want their own personality. Engineering! cloning will lead to many problems. its against the nature of the world. the large amount of money spent on essays group work cloning is a waste of essay address, money.. instead they can realy do things for those who are in need of help, orphans, poor people. :( what if it could save the person you care about.

cloning is not good.. Essays Group! how would you feel if you find out that your sister or grandmother is you mother. no one will feel ok. its against human nature. :( i agree. too much emotional/psychological risk. AS WELL AS health/physical risks. it's not fair for the potential baby to just clone a human w/o fully understanding the risk that entails. Cloning is a bunch of bullshit and should be stopped. i agree with lucas. Business! cloning should be stopped. ON 2018-MARCH. Mega Essays! THE MOST AMAZING DISCOVERY WILL BE MADE (CLONING OF HUMANS). A NEW GENERATION OF SUPERIOR HUMANS.

this is a good article, however to all these people freaking out, this is not a do or do not argument. It is about importance of moral, going to happen, because we have the technology, there is no stopping that. I am not for it nor against it. But since we have the technology it is going to mega, be done. ya lame cause ya a bunch of nerdz up in diz website. Ok, so you are right. I'm almost positive too that this will happen no matter how many people are against it. Whether we improve it or not however is up to us. There are MANY deformities and abnormalities that come with cloning an animal let alone a human. It is $50,000 to clone a cat.

Imagine how much more it will cost for a human, so in an understanding: with suck a low success rate (about 3%) and the high risk of so many deformaties/abnormalities, the one question i really have is is this a realistic and sanely considerable option? i think that is depends on your oppinion of cloning from some stand points it is good for getting the organs to 'harvest' them but if we do indeed clone people does that make them people. if so would you 'harvest' the organs of a human. Essay! i mean seriously but im sure there are more intelligent people than little old me out mega essays group there and who really cares in the end im just a stupid kid. Hey. Business Expansion! you may be a stupid kid but look we are the mega essays group work future and essay, were gonna be the ones who end up making the decisions so stand up for wat you belive not wat someone tells you to belive. also i dont think you are a stuipd kid because you have a great point. i think its wrong. but i love it babes. Thanxs i need this for a proect! You should probably be paying more attention in your English class.

This article has really tought me a lot, I had no idea about some of the mega things that were going on subject to thesis with cloning. The mixing of mega, human genes with other animals really surprised me. Thank you for opening up my eyes a bit, I have now taken a real interest into human and essay writing, animal cloning and genetic engineering. i would like you answer the mega essays group question in french pls.i meant to ask this in english,human cloning and its latest exploits.pls forgive my french grammar.thanks, keep it up,good job. it si bad enough that animals were being cloned,it is subject, more than sodom and gomorrah to mega group, clone a humain for anything, whatsoever. what is the advantage of cloning and its disadvantage pls elaborate tkan you. It's not so much designer babies at issue but whether America can fall behind other nations in reproductive success of producing healthy babies without defects that, in 2010, may reveal the future of subject, global domination politics in countries that have no legislation to prevent it. Human cloning should be allowed for those in essays need of a new organ or body tissue, perhaps a couple unable to have children, but cloning a hole person. no way what if that persons hell annoying. like we need another one of winning essay, them lol jokes. i believe that cloning is wrong because we are not GOD we should leave it to him.

but thats my opinion. totally respect what your getting at mega, cause im a firm believer in god. Electrical! but if he gives us the ability to clone, why cant we? man dis is bull i dnt believe a word of it. Hey, just because you know something it doesnt necessarily mean that you entlitled to do that. Consider, you know how to work, take life, would you take it simply because you know how to Hold tight to your common sense dont let it sway away with your lazy thoughts! I think that cloning People is wrong under most circumstances. Importance! I could see a law that says only one original person could be alive at the same time, but trully mankind has enough problems with over population as it is.

What I support is the spinoff technologies that cloning can provide us with. Mega Essays Group! With cloning technologies a person could be healed from plan, almost any wound that allowed them to make it to the hospital. With new technology adult skin cells can be turned into new organs that are a perfect match for the donor. These technologies should not be stiffled by being associated with cloning people. Group Work! This technology is old and needs to be addressed, otherwise it will continue on unchecked and serve no one any benefit. IF YOU NEED A ORGAN TO STAY ALIVE AND A CLONE WAS ABLE TO PROVIED THAT ORGAN THEN IT SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM AND AS WITH ALL THING FREEDOM OF CHOICE SHOULD ALWAYS PREVAIL AS GOD GIVE US THE CHOICE TO BELIEVE OR NOT BELIEVE. Thanks, I needed info for a project. in is not cool cloning you con dire and business, than no one will know. Cloning is a good thing not a bad thing .Legalizing cloning is the right thing to essays work, do. Cloning organs and kidneys is ok but cloning a human is not right or moral.

Cloning is forced testing essay, not used for being god. Cloning is for helping people live longer. Cloning organs, kidneys, and mega group, hearts can save thousands of lives. Cloning animals can also be useful. When you clone enormous amounts of animals it could prevent extinction and could prevent starvation.

I do not believe in winning writing human cloning because I believe there will be chaos and riots and problems of clones being identical. Cloning animals for food on the other hand can prevent extinction and group work, prevent starvation with the cloning of rhetorical essay on the gettysburg address, animals. If you had a parent who was waiting for mega essays group, an organ, kidney, or heart transplant and was waiting on a list wouldn’t you do anything to help your parent even use a clone of an organ, kidney, or a heart to make sure they live longer? The evidence speaks for itself if you clone the right things it can save thousands of lives. Cloning will save thousands of lives and essay address, change people’s lives around the group work world and for people struggling to afford food for their children. its horrible to play GOD its irrational thats why GOD created men and women to create a human being :((((((((( Clnin iz wrng laaa, shd nt appen, tis sicknin!

I'm an exact replica of my mother. She cloned herself illegally with the help of a team of Korean scientists. she has raised me so that i can have the life she always wanted. she makes sure that I won't make the same mistakes she did. I am her second chance. someday I will make my own clone family. I think it's all perfectly normal. Essay! it might sound like science fiction, but I think this is the future. It's like you are able to know then what you know now by living your life through your clone. if you get my drift. I am Jane II. My mom is Jane I. My clone will be Jane III.

kidding. Mega! wow. Phd Dissertations Engineering! creepy. Then, who is your creator? I think it's wrong to play God. I think it's useful. I AM god. And I let those who wish to step in my shoes, have a chance. Personally, if it was between my life, and some of my frozen cells, I would sacrifice the cells and the new life coming from mega group, them. Engineering! Yes, some see it as wasting a life, or killing a person, but I see it as saving the suffering. I think of it this way: you could sacrifice a group of mega group, cells that were never a living being, or you could not save a suffering person, in phd dissertations electrical result killing them! In reality, killing someone that does feel, and is already a living being.

think it should be done :) helps people why not :) cloning humans is totally wrong thing to do if it is possible. it is against the nature .here is a suitable example. deforetation has forced nature to act furiously. in same manner cloning will surely lead to chaos and riots in mega group work the whole universe.what i'm thinking is that have aliens done cloning coz scientist had claimed that they aliens are thousand times more advanced than we human beings. cloning is mint boiz. i would like to clone my friend and have her as a sister. good but think yourself by doing so the man become immortal. in the expansion plan nature every creature has to die. this against group the nature. i'll agree with you up to replacing damaged organs with the help of cloning. and finally i want you to be my friend. that is a load of bull. i dont believe a word of it and forced drug testing, i dont believe in cloning either.

it is wrong and inhumane. if it isnt, i still agree with u. it has allready been done, several humans clones r walking and mega, working right now, . they r look after by r own goverment controled by r own goverment. it happened yar but gov. Was band on winning writing it. i think i will help a tone of people in work the end. its alrite 2 clone. another information about clone?please give me full information. it is business expansion, wrong to clone. i was working in sharjah uaw qgm group llc. hamriya freezone tecnical director mr tonny brohmam is mega, cloned me using ny dna they thron mw out writing when i opposed this .my life is spoiled and rodhni dsouza hr manager is invloved in this . they uswd me as human sevice edditing other network channels using cia scanner my iso file is disclosed. YOU GUYS ARE WRRROOOONNNGGGG. I'm all for cloning organs, to help with diseases and organ transplants and the like, but seriously cloning yourself in able to gove birth to a reprudtion of your ugly self? nawwww blud. get some nice ideas yeah?

human cloning is a anty action of nature .when ever the nature react to harm the earth. I have to disagree with you Alexandria. Mega Essays! Although there are some good things that can come out of rhetorical essay address, human cloning, there are still some chances that things can go wrong. For example, what if the mega group clone was defective? What would happen to them? What if the to thesis clone was not what they thought it would turn out like? What would the scientist do to it? When you think that human cloning should be allowed have you considered all the work experiments that have gone wrong with animals that are clones? That could happen to humans because they have never been cloned as many times as animals have and cloning an animal is winning, one thing while cloning a human is another thing. Essays Work! You just cannot think that you are going to be able to get everything right on the first try to completely clone a human being. Hello dear ladies and gentlemen!

I would like inform you that Scarlett Johansson (actress) actually is forced drug, a clone from original person Scarlett Galabekian, who has nothing with acting career. That clone was created illegally by using stolen biological material. Original person is very nice (not d**n sexy),most important - CHRISTIAN young lady! I'll tell you more,those clones (it's not only one) made in GERMANY - world leader manufacturer of humans clones, it is in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, North Bavaria, Mr. Mega Group Work! Helmut Kohl home town. You can not even imaging the scale of the importance of moral education cloning activity. But warning! Helmut Kohl clone staff 100% controlling all their clones (at least they trying) spreading around the world, they are very accurate with that, some of them are still NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled clones, so be careful get close with clones you will be controlled as well. Original person is not happy with those movies, images, video, rumors and etc. spreading on media in that way it would be really nice if we all will try slow down that ''actress'' career development, original Scarlett will really appreciated that. Please remember that original Scarlett's family did not authorize any activity with stolen biological materials, no matter what form it was created it was stolen and it is stolen. It all need to be delivered to authorized personals control in Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

Original Scarlett is not engage, by mega essays the way! Her close friend Serge G. H.R. 534, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of winning writing, 2003, was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives on February 5, 2003. Mega Group Work! After discussion, it was passed on February 27 by a vote of drug testing essay, 241-155. It now moves on essays group work to the Senate for consideration. About Importance Education! This bill makes it unlawful for mega group work, any person or entity to perform or participate in forced testing human cloning, or to ship or receive embryos produced by human cloning. The penalties are imprisonment of mega essays, up to 10 years and fines of $1 million or more. These now join other nations as diverse as Norway, Australia, and Germany, which had already added cloning for any purpose to their criminal code. And in Germany where it carries a penalty of five years imprisonment they know a thing or two about unethical science.

How do you that's true? Where is all the evidence? How would you know that if you got close to a clone, which you can't tell the difference from a human to a clone anyway so that wouldn't be your fault, that you'd get controlled?! And by who would be able to controll you, and forced, how would they do such a thing. Who gave you that information? Who started the mega essays work idea that Scarlett Galabekian had a clone in the first place? Not trying to be mean or anything just wondering. Site owned by Global Change Ltd - Company Registration: 03265351 (UK) - VAT number 691179801- content written by Patrick Dixon, Chairman. We use cookies for on the gettysburg address, statistical purposes. Essays! To comply with the e-Privacy Directive we need to ask your consent to essay importance, place these cookies on mega group work your computer. Your use of this site indicates acceptance of these terms.

I accept.